Blog & Articles

There are many frequencies and frequency patterns that are constantly playing in the background within the atmosphere where all creatures live out their lives on this planet we call Earth. Although some of them are within the range perceptible to our eyes (visible frequencies) and ears (audible frequencies), the vast majority of them are invisible and inaudible to our five senses.

These frequencies that we have been exposed to since the very first cell division which started our growth in the womb, and will be exposed to until our last breath, very profoundly affect us even if we can’t perceive them with our senses.

Like a sort of “theme song” of our Earthly lives, playing out in the background like a gentle and beautiful soundtrack, every function of our bodies and minds are entrained with and affected by these subtle and diverse frequencies. If you overlay them on a chart of the electromagnetic spectrum, the majority of them would be categorized in the Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) range, generally between 0.1 and 300 hertz.

This is also known as the human responsive range of frequencies, which are frequencies that exist widely throughout nature and the cosmos that humans have been exposed to for our entire existence. It’s also a frequency range that our bodies are very responsive to, and these responses are beneficial and healthful as long as the frequencies are moving and shifting in a natural way.

In nature, there are no continuous, repetitive frequencies. Everything fluctuates constantly, usually in subtle ways, with regard to exact frequencies and the amplitude (aka loudness/strength) of these frequencies. Even the general patterns that exist widely throughout nature (such as Phi/Fibonacci patterns) will NOT ever repeat at exactly the same frequencies and amplitudes more than once. There is infinite variation in nature. It is only the manmade technology of modern times that utilizes repetitive frequencies.

The Schumann resonances are foundational for life on Earth

One of the most important groups of frequencies that play in the background of our lives constantly are called the Schumann resonances.

The large space between the surface of the Earth and the ionosphere (a portion of the upper atmosphere that’s full of charged particles from incoming solar rays) acts as a closed, spherical waveguide to contain and direct frequencies generated between the Earth and ionosphere. This waveguide acts as a resonant cavity that’s charged mainly by lightning strikes (which happen on an average of 200 per second globally!), but it can also be affected by other electromagnetic disturbances, including geomagnetic micropulsations (small fluctuations in the Earth’s magnetic field).

The Schumann resonances were named after German physicist Winfried Otto Schumann, who first predicted them in 1952, and they were first accurately measured between 1960 and 1963.

The fundamental (and usually the strongest) frequency of the Schumann resonances is around 7.8 hertz. This is the frequency of a waveform that’s equal in size to the circumference of the Earth. Additionally, there are several frequencies that are natural harmonics of this fundamental frequency, which are half the circumference of the Earth, one-third of the circumference, one-fourth of the circumference, etc. The Schumann resonance harmonic frequencies are recorded at around 14 hertz, 20 hertz, 27, 33, 39, 45, and sometimes even higher. These higher frequencies usually aren’t as strong (lower amplitude), but they are continuously being recorded by Schumann resonance frequency monitors. The higher the harmonic, generally the lower its amplitude (power) is.

One of the most important things to understand about these Schumann resonances is they are NOT static in their frequency! Although the foundational frequency is commonly said to be 7.83 hertz, it actually fluctuates daily between 7.2 and 8.8 hertz, and sometimes will drop down or jump up 3.5 hertz from the base frequency range in special circumstances, such as during coronal mass ejections from the Sun that cause an influx of photons to enter the ionosphere, slightly changing the size of the resonant cavity between the Earth’s surface and the ionosphere. The solar energy hitting the Earth’s atmosphere causes regular compression and expansion of the upper wall of the closed cavity, which is the primary force that subtly alters the Schumann resonance frequencies.

You may occasionally find devices on the market that are being sold as Schumann resonance generators, that emit a continuous frequency of 7.83 hertz. While this may have some positive effects in the short term, it is not healthy to be exposed to ANY continuous frequency for a long period of time, since continuous static frequencies do not exist in nature. Therefore, any benefit from these types of devices will be limited and short term, and may have detrimental effects if they’re used regularly. Anything emitting a constant 7.83 hertz is not an accurate representation of the Schumann resonances in nature, which are constantly in flux, and include several harmonic frequencies in addition to the base frequency.

To get an idea of the types of fluctuations that occur with the true Schumann resonances, listen to this 3-minute audio of the resonances that was recorded by a magnetic sensor in California. The frequencies were shifted upwards into the audible range, so not completely accurate to the true frequencies, but you will definitely get an idea. Notice how it rings like a tuning fork!

Schumann resonances example audio

What is the relationship between Earth frequencies and our bodies?

The interaction between the Schumann resonance frequencies and our bodies and minds is still being studied, but it’s clear that they absolutely do affect us! Every cell in our bodies, especially those of our brain, heart and nervous system, are highly tuned, extremely sensitive living electrochemical receivers and transmitters. Subtle electromagnetic fields produced by processes in our own bodies are what turn on and off the chemical messengers that perform every function essential to keeping us alive and healthy.

Most human brainwave states fall within the first five Schumann resonance modes, between 7 and 35 hertz. The theta and alpha brainwave states, which are necessary for growth, repair and optimal brain function and creativity, meet right around the fundamental 7.8 hertz Schumann resonance frequency.

“Schumann’s successor, Dr. Herbert König demonstrated a connection between Schumann Resonance and brain rhythms. König compared human EEG recordings with natural electromagnetic fields in the environment, finding that 7.83 Hz is the dominant brain wave rhythm of all mammals in alpha or resting state. When the brain resonates with SR energy, information is transmitted that appears to coordinate psychophysical systems.” (source)

Continuously bathing in the Schumann resonances seems essential for human survival and optimal health. This was discovered when it was noticed that astronauts, when they left the Earth’s magnetic field, could no longer regulate their mental and emotional states and became aggressive towards one another. Additionally, during longer space flights, astronauts would lose a large percentage of their muscle and bone mass. These disturbing side effects were avoided on future trips by using a Schumann resonance generator during the flights.

In addition to the resonances that are generated in the space between the Earth’s surface and the ionosphere, the Earth itself emits a resonant frequency from a combination of the infrared waves from the hot core, and re-radiated solar energy absorbed by the surface. This frequency fluctuates between 10 and 11.75 hertz, which lines up with the higher part of the mammalian alpha brain wave spectrum.

It is amazing, and certainly not coincidental, that the planet we live on emits the exact same frequency as our own brains when we’re in a state of present moment awareness and alert relaxation! Increasing your alpha brain waves can result in reducing symptoms of depression and improving creativity. It’s like we are entraining our brains with the Earth itself, so it’s no wonder the effects are so beneficial!

Dr. Robert C. Beck, physicist and EMF researcher, found that the human body has numerous very specific frequencies that trigger production of different endorphins, beta-endorphins, catecholamines, enkephalins, dynorphins, proteins, and stem cells. He found about 250 different key frequencies that trigger the body to produce its own healing chemicals. He also studied different types of “healers” from many traditions all over the world, and found that they all produced similar brain wave patterns while performing a healing, which centered around 7.8-8 hertz. Subsequent studies on this showed that the brain waves of some of the subjects/patients receiving healing became phase and frequency synchronized to the Schumann resonance during “healing moments”.

Itzhak Bentov, a scientist in the 1970s, discovered a connection between steady 7 to 8 hertz brain wave activity (which occurs during meditation) and the activation of other systems in the body. This may explain electromagnetically how meditation benefits the body and mind in a myriad of ways.

One reason we are highly sensitive to external electromagnetic fields, both natural and artificial, is because our DNA itself acts as a fractal antenna. Human DNA has been found to possess two important characteristics of a fractal antenna – self-symmetry, and conductive properties. Interestingly, weakly powered electromagnetic fields that don’t have enough strength to cause heating in localized body tissue, are actually absorbed at around 60 times the power by our DNA, due to its perfect antenna characteristics! This could account for the many studies that show single and double strand DNA damage from exposure to non-thermal (too weak to heat tissue) manmade electromagnetic fields.

Is the fundamental Schumann resonance frequency changing?

There is a theory circulating on the internet that the Schumann resonance frequency is becoming higher over time, and is no longer 7.8 hertz. They make the claim that this raise in frequency, which some say is up to 11 or 12 hertz or even much higher, is related to a “raising of human consciousness”. There may be a little bit of truth to this, but there are some inaccuracies that need to be addressed.

The fundamental Schumann resonance frequency will only change if the Earth itself gets smaller, since a waveform that’s as long as the circumference of the Earth will always resonate around 7.8 hertz. The smaller the waveform, the higher the frequency, so the Earth would literally have to shrink for this base frequency to become higher.

However, the Schumann resonances DO change in amplitude, or strength/power. Although there is no evidence of this being a linear change (meaning it hasn’t increased in amplitude consistently over time), there are certain influences that can cause the power of the resonances to spike for certain periods of time. One result of this is the appearance of higher frequency harmonics than have previously been seen. Generally, the stronger the base frequency is expressing, the stronger the harmonics will become, and you may even begin to see harmonics at frequencies that were previously undetectable. In 2019, a harmonic of 156 hertz was recorded, which would be the 20^th harmonic of the base frequency! In some instances, one of the harmonics will even express at stronger power levels than the base frequency for a period of time.

Any sort of higher meaning in this is speculative, but it’s certainly possible that the occurrence of higher frequency harmonics could influence human consciousness on a large scale. Higher frequencies that are still within the human responsive range are associated with gamma brain wave states in mammals. These are the fastest brain waves states that humans can produce, usually between 35 and 100 hertz, and are related to intense states of focus and being actively engaged in problem solving.

With this information in mind, the evolution and maturing of human consciousness and societal behavior could certainly be related to an increase in the power of the Schumann resonances and the appearance of higher frequency harmonics.

How do manmade EMFs affect our relationship to natural Earth frequencies?

It is clear that our bodies are highly attuned to, and vitally dependent on, the symphony of Earth frequencies that plays constantly in the background of our lives. Between the subtle variations of the Schumann resonances, the resonant frequencies from the Earth’s core and surface itself, and the vast range of micro frequencies emitted from all the other living beings around us (including plants, minerals, bacteria, animals and insects), this extremely complex overlaying of frequencies teems with life and helps our bodies function optimally.

What happens when you start adding artificial electromagnetic fields from cell towers, cell phones, Wifi, radar, and power lines, which operate at millions of times the power levels and usually millions of times higher frequencies as our natural background exposure?

Like a tuning fork, our bodies will no longer be able to hear and attune to these subtle natural frequencies as well, and will have no choice but to attempt to resonate with these louder fields that currently predominate in our environment. The problem is, these fields are unnatural and biologically incompatible in every way imaginable. The frequencies themselves are repetitive, like an alarm clock or car alarm (that’s what they might sound like if we could hear them). The frequencies are generally in the megahertz to gigahertz range, which is far higher and faster than the human responsive range that our bodies are adapted to. This constant exposure to repetitive high frequencies is overstimulating to every cell in our body, causing very sensitive internal mechanisms like our voltage gated calcium channels to flood calcium into our cells, setting off a chain reaction of agitated and uncontrolled activity in our bodies.

The engineers at Blushield have extensively studied natural frequency patterns, the infinite variations of subtle frequencies that occur in nature that never repeat more than once in the exact same way, and the human responsive range that we are adapted to and respond to beneficially. These complex patterns are programmed into a tiny microchip, and emitted into the environment on a scalar carrier wave that’s produced using crystal photonics. Since the devices use the high powered electricity source of mains power (or a battery, in the case of the portables), the signal is broadcasted at a higher amplitude, effectively competing against the harmful, repetitive EMFs in a way that the natural background frequencies are unable to do.

Your body then entrains with the nature-based patterns that Blushield emits, just as your ancestors were entrained with the background frequencies of the Earth and cosmos before the arrival of manmade electronics. Since Blushield’s patterns and scalar delivery mechanism are based on natural patterns, it could also help your body become more receptive to the Earth’s frequencies again, helping you entrain with the vital Schumann resonances.

To help you determine which Blushield model would be ideal for your particular needs and level of EMF exposure, please read our Blushield Product Guide or visit our Product page.

For more information on the electromagnetic spectrum, and how EMFs affect the subtle mechanisms of our bodies, you can delve deeper into these topics here:

An Introduction to the Electromagnetic Spectrum

Microwave EMFs Shown to Cause Depression & Anxiety

We’ve been contacted many times now from frustrated and disappointed people who tell us that a new cell tower or antenna just popped up suddenly one day, very close to their house, or close to their children’s school. The frustration comes from not having any idea prior that this was going to happen, and feeling like they had no say in the matter.

For our customers here at Blushield, the main cause for concern is the deleterious health effects of living so close to a cell tower, and we agree that this is the number one reason to be concerned! To read more about how and why EMFs are so harmful to the health of living organisms, browse our Education page for a lot more information.

Among the general public who aren’t necessarily aware of the health effects of EMFs, seeing a cell tower near their home is usually distasteful for other reasons.

The main concern in the minds of most people is aesthetic, especially in areas where natural features like trees, lakes and rivers are highly valued, and near historic points of interest where people want to maintain the authentic historical feel of an area that attracts tourists from all over. Another concern that’s related to aesthetics is an anticipated reduction of a homeowner’s property value from an unsightly cell tower. A big cell tower (or even a smaller antenna that’s visible) installed in a neighborhood is, quite frankly, an eyesore for almost anyone.

Is there any way we can gain awareness of new tower and antenna plans in our local areas prior to their installation, and then have a say in whether they are allowed to install them within our municipality? Yes! It can be a bit complicated legally in some circumstances, but we each have more say in this than we think. It just takes some study to grasp a basic understanding of the issue, and how we can play our part and make a difference.

Recent local area wins against cell tower installations

Americans for Responsible Technology (ART) is “a national coalition of grassroots organizations with a mission to stop the unconstrained proliferation of 5G small cell antennas and promote equitable access to technologies that benefit society and protect the health, safety, security, privacy and property of all Americans.”

ART just reported on several local area legal wins against telecom applications to install towers. The local municipalities were able to reject the tower or antenna proposal through certain legally valid means.

In July of this year, Lakeland, Florida was able to reject a proposed 150-foot cell tower using aesthetic, historical and zoning arguments. The cell tower would have been installed very close to multi-family homes, a large lake that’s valued for its recreational opportunities, and historic Dixieland. The court voted 3-2 to reject the cell tower installation, citing that the tower would take up valuable, desirable land that could be used for family housing and recreation. Their explanation also emphasized the visual disturbance the tower would create for those wanting to enjoy beautiful views at nearby Lake Hunter, and an authentic experience in the historic district of Dixieland.

The city council in Brawley, California rejected the proposed installation of a cell tower in a residential area that includes a big park with baseball fields, a gymnasium, pool and skating rink. Many of the local residents attended the city council meeting and voiced their opposition to the tower being installed, even if it meant spotty T-Mobile coverage in the area. Many residents were concerned about the health effects that the big tower may have on their children who use the park, and others were concerned about it reducing their property values, and it having a “significant negative visual impact on the area”. The tower was rejected with a 5-0 unanimous vote.

A proposal for a 125-foot AT&T cell tower in Loudoun County, Virginia, was rejected 8-1 last month by the Loudoun County board of supervisors. The tower would have been built on top of the Short Hill Mountain ridgeline, and although that would have improved coverage in the surrounding area, the sight of the tower and the environmental impact of the monopole and ground facility were undesirable to the vast majority of residents and local government. The tower installation would have run counter to the Loudoun land use plan that states that towers need to be built on the downslope of the ridgeline, not the top. Local residents argued that their current cell phone coverage is not really in crisis, and that the land use plan also protects the environmental and scenic qualities of the county’s prime viewsheds. Short Hill Mountain is an important feature in the iconic visual experience from one of the most popular short hikes on the Appalachian National Scenic Trail, Weverton Cliffs in central Maryland.

“To make a permanent environmental change for a short term technological issue — when you have technological advances that are happening every five, 10, 15 years with huge advances — I’m not going to do anything that is environmentally harmful for a short-term technological gain,” says Loudoun County chairwoman Phyllis Randall.

The city council of Sylvania, Ohio, voted unanimously to reject a proposal to install a 140-foot Verizon cell tower at Northview High School. The ART organization assisted the residents of Sylvania in defeating this ill-sited tower proposal.

The biggest recent win for activists was the veto of California State Bill 556. The bill was introduced in February, and after months of non-stop lobbying, letter writing campaigns, testifying at public hearings, and much more, the governor vetoed the bill. SB 556 was a telecom-industry sponsored bill that would have removed significant local control over the deployment of 5G antennas in communities across the entire State of California.

Resources to help you take local action

The Americans for Responsible Technology website contains a freely available 5G Activist Toolkit, which includes sample letters and flyers that can be customized and sent to your local officials, neighbors and schools, a sample small cell code for villages, towns and small cities, and information on successful lobbying and legislative outreach. It is a fantastic resource that we encourage everyone to explore to see how they can participate in making positive change in their local area!

It’s important to voice your concerns about the potential health hazards of radiation from nearby cell towers, but ART states that the most consistent winning strategy for fighting unwanted cell towers is arguing that the tower will impose an eyesore on your community, devalue nearby properties, and/or have a detrimental visual impact on surrounding historic areas.

They also emphasize ensuring that your local telecommunications ordinance is up-to-date and contains specific language to protect residents of your community from ill-sited 5G "small cell" antennas. They wrote a simple Checklist for Municipal Codes Addressing Small Cell Installations as a resource to help any local municipality cover their bases and create appropriately difficult hoops for telecoms to jump through that will ensure they don’t force their way into a community that doesn’t want or need their products and services.

How can you stay informed about proposals for future tower installations in your area? You can file a FOIL (Freedom of Information Law) request on your locality’s website. Ask to review all pending applications for wireless telecommunications facilities within a one-mile radius of your home. Contact your local clerk if you have questions or concerns about how to do this. To be able to take action against a new cell tower proposal, it’s best to know about it in advance, so this is an important step!

These are great ways to get started taking local action to keep your neighborhood free of unwanted radiation and environmental clutter. Please pass this information on to anyone you know who is interested and would benefit from it!

References:

Americans for Responsible Technology: 5G Activist Toolkit – https://www.americansforresponsibletech.org/tool-kit

Americans for Responsible Technology: Checklist for Municipal Codes Addressing Small Cell Installations – https://ed84ae68-328e-42f4-847a-66fb863ac9df.filesusr.com/ugd/2cea04_125c2a55c01e4bd6b3b2b800426d9fa7.pdf

California SB-556 Street light poles, traffic signal poles: small wireless facilities attachments – https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB556

“Brawley says no to cell tower” – https://www.thedesertreview.com/news/brawley-says-no-to-cell-tower/article_be4e9012-2687-11ec-8db7-ff196f6fffcd.html

U.S. District Court, Tampa Division: North American Towers LLC vs. City of Lakeland – https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UduHGlTiyfgbFpDRAAHpTtu0yTwVT7jS/view

“Loudoun supervisors deny proposed AT&T cell tower” – https://www.loudountimes.com/news/loudoun-supervisors-deny-proposed-at-t-cell-tower/article_0323db26-2632-11ec-ab90-9f404beb2700.html

Over the past couple decades, as cell phone use in cars (even while driving) has become commonplace, the question of whether cell phone use hinders the safety of operating a vehicle has been asked with increasing frequency. First and foremost, there is the obvious consideration of a highly distracting element being added into the environment of the driver, creating the impulse or necessity of diverting their attention from watching the road and operating the vehicle. The common consensus is that this is unsafe, and has become a frequent cause of automobile accidents.

A more recent concern, with the rise of hands-free cell phone systems that enable you to keep your eyes on the road and hands on the steering wheel, is the discovery of the way that interacting with the information stimulus from your phone affects your brain function. It occupies your awareness and prompts you to interact with this stimulus, which inherently decreases driving safety, stealing your focus away from driving your car and paying attention to your surroundings closely enough so that you can react instantly when there’s a danger or obstruction on the road.

These dangers have been established and widely agreed upon, and public information cautioning the use of cell phones while driving is now widespread. It is even against the law now in many places. 1.3 million people per year worldwide die in auto accidents, and between 20 and 50 million suffer non-fatal injuries. Avoiding cell phone use while driving is one of several common public guidelines for increasing safety on the roads, listed just after avoiding driving under the influence of drugs and alcohol and obeying speed limits.

A much more recent line of inquiry is if the health effects of the electromagnetic fields themselves, from cell phone use and other sources like radar sensors (and even the car motor itself), may be hindering the brain and nervous system function of drivers, affecting their ability to safely operate their vehicles. This is a very valid question, considering the established effects of EMFs on the brain and nervous system, and one that needs to be explored thoroughly to make sure our roadways are as safe as possible as EMF sources like 5G antennas and vehicle radar systems are increasing exponentially, increasing our radiation exposure while we drive our cars.

Polish study from 2013 finds 3x increase in RF radiation while driving

A study published in the International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health in 2013 sought to understand this issue in greater depth. Note that even 8 years ago when this study was published, cell phone use in cars was minimal compared to what it is today, with much less daily use per cell phone user, as well as slower speeds and less overall data transfer. When the study was actually done, in 2011, 4G was only just being announced and phones were still operating within the 3G standard, which only rarely included video streaming.

A working group of scientists in Poland saw a need for research to be done into the effects of radiofrequency radiation on humans operating motor vehicles. Past studies have demonstrated that EMFs may affect EEG recordings in subjects performing complex mental tasks, as well as modify human working memory and cognitive functions. This study hypothesizes that cell phone EMFs may adversely affect a driver’s response to road traffic situations.

Since there have been little to no prior studies in this area, it was first important to establish a driver’s EMF exposure levels while driving and using a cell phone, to act as a baseline for subsequent studies to measure effects of these EMFs at appropriate levels that simulate real life use.

They used motor vehicle simulators in a controlled environment, and the EMF exposure was facilitated using a commercial Nokia phone set to emit a UMTS (Universal Mobile Telecommunications System) test signal. The study states, “The source used in our experiment enabled the generation of a signal identical to that occurring in real conditions, with full repeatability and stability ensured.”

The EMF readings were taken at the position of the driver’s head (to simulate the driver talking with the phone held to the ear), as well as at the position of the dashboard (for hands free cell phone setups). The tests were done with the phones at full power (to simulate use in rural areas with poor base station signal) as well as at 20% power (representing urban areas with good base station coverage). The readings were measured at 16 separate locations inside the vehicle, corresponding to parts of the body of a driver. Unsurprisingly, the highest readings were found near the head of the simulated driver using the cell phone against the ear.

Interestingly, they also compared measurements inside the vehicle simulator to measurements using the same cell phone outside the vehicle, and found 3 times greater EMF exposure levels inside the vehicle! The study commented about the threefold greater exposure within the vehicle simulator:

“Those values are elevated mainly due to the induction of EMF in the simulator’s metal parts and EMF rebounding from metal exterior planes. Our results correspond to those published by other authors, showing an increase of exposure inside a motor vehicle compared to the theoretically calculated free space conditions.”

Cars are Faraday cages that concentrate EMFs

As the study results showed, and the researchers explained, the metal parts of the car’s frame and body panels act to block the dispersal of EMFs generated inside the vehicle. In free space, they would escape into the surrounding area, diluting their concentration. Inside a car, because the metal body will partially block external signals, it is more likely that your phone will have a harder time receiving a signal from a nearby cell tower, thereby ramping up the signal amplitude to a higher level to achieve a connection, increasing the EMF exposure of those inside the car by up to 400%.

Additionally, the signal the phone tries to send back to the tower may “bounce off” the metal walls inside the car several times before it finds its way out and back to the tower, exposing everyone in the car to higher levels of radiation. It makes complete sense that these study results showed increased EMF intensity inside the car.

Modern cars have additional problems. Most new cars come with radar sensor systems that are designed to alert the driver to other vehicles or obstructions around the car, for the purpose of deceasing collisions due to driver negligence. These radar systems operate in the millimeter wave range, usually between 24 GHz and 77 GHz. These are higher frequencies than most 5G antennas currently use! Although they are fairly low power (low amplitude) in their signal output, they are also much closer to our bodies than 5G antennas, and they are operating the entire time the vehicle is turned on, so our exposure is constant. Due to the Faraday cage-like structure of the car body, these millimeter wave radar signals will also concentrate inside the car. The study did not test this aspect of modern cars, as it was not widespread during the time of the study.

Also, the car’s motor itself, as well as its internal computers, are constantly emitting EMFs within extremely close range of the front seat driver and passenger. A motor emits electric and magnetic fields as part of its basic function, even if it’s an older car with very little computerized aspects.

The elaborate computer systems and large storage battery in electric cars, which many people now drive, take this to the next level! There were only about 17,000 electric cars on the road in 2010. By 2019, that number has reached 7.2 million!

All of the above considered, you can see that driving is very different now than it used to be. For the long-term health and critical short-term driving safety of you and your passengers, you will want to make sure you are adequately protected from EMFs anytime you are in your car.

Ideal EMF protection for frequent driving

Blushield has a selection of several stationary home units to provide EMF protection at home, as well as several portable models small enough to fit in your pocket. In most cases, carrying your handheld portable with you when you’re out and about, including in your car, is perfectly adequate. If you have an electric car or a modern car equipped with radar sensors, or if you frequently travel through dense urban areas, be sure to use one of our portable models.

If you want to have the best possible protection while driving, you can plug any of our stationary home models into your car, using our Auto Adapter Cord accessory instead of the standard AC wall plug that comes with the device. The auto cord plugs into the 12 volt cigarette lighter in your vehicle. Our favorite home models for vehicle use, due to their convenient size and shape and strong protective field, are the Phi 03 (strong) or U2 Premium Ultra (twice as strong as the Phi 03).

The Phi 03 or U2 Premium Ultra running in your car will emit a very large protective field. This is a good choice for anyone who spends a lot of time in their car, such as truck drivers and anyone who commutes long distances, drives their car for work, or takes frequent long road trips. It is strong enough to act as a "home unit in your car", to maintain resonance with the Blushield field for long periods of continuous road time.

It stays plugged into your car at all times, eliminating the possibility of not being protected due to accidentally leaving your portable at home. It also does not need to be charged like the portable units do, and will run anytime your car is on (or anytime you can access the battery through a plug, which some plugs will do even when the car is off).

If your work demands that you’re in your car for many hours straight every day, you are exposed to considerably higher EMF levels than most people. This is especially the case if your job requires that you use your cell phone in your car to stay connected with your employer or customers. Larger vehicles like delivery trucks and 18-wheelers have larger motors, which emit higher levels of EMFs. The vehicle’s metal cage concentrates these EMFs inside, affecting driver and passengers more profoundly.

If you find that driving leaves you fatigued and unfocused, and with other EMF related symptoms, a Blushield stationary or portable unit in your vehicle could give you some welcome relief! It brings the biologically coherent, nature-based frequency patterns of Blushield into the previously chaotic, incoherent space of your car, and help make your driving experience healthier, safer and more comfortable.

References:

Original paper: “The pattern of the electromagnetic field emitted by mobile phones in motor vehicle driving simulators” – http://ijomeh.eu/The-pattern-of-the-electromagnetic-field-emitted-by-mobile-phones-in-motor-vehicle-driving-simulators,2192,0,2.html

Last year, we wrote about a major lawsuit related to the effects of radiofrequency radiation on human health and the environment. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) was challenged by two health and environmental activist organizations, Children’s Health Defense and the Environmental Health Trust, for refusing to update its grossly outdated and inadequate wireless radiation “health” guidelines that were established 25 years ago and haven’t been updated since.

Earlier this month, the D.C. Court of Appeals made their final decision. The FCC lost the case, and was found guilty of ignoring substantive evidence of harm from radiofrequency radiation. After examining the mountains of evidence submitted by the plaintiffs on the wide spectrum of harm from wireless radiation, the court’s judgement states:

“The case be remanded to the commission to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect against harmful effects of exposure to radiofrequency radiation…”

The case is closed, the FCC lost, and now it is their legal responsibility to meaningfully address decades worth of scientific studies and individuals’ testimonies of RF radiation harming health and the environment.

We have been directly supporting this cause financially, through Blushield USA’s monthly donations to the Children’s Health Defense campaign to Stop 5G! We are beyond happy that this case was successful and are excited to see how this ripples outward to help similar causes to fight the proliferation of harmful wireless exposure, and help more individuals to wake up to wireless harms now that the United States justice system itself is pointing out flaws in FCC accountability.

Reviewing the CHD vs FCC case on wireless exposure health guidelines

You may recall our initial article about this case we posted last October, after the principal brief was filed, called The FCC Is Being Sued! How To Stop 5G. The event that prompted the lawsuit last year was the FCC’s refusal to review and update their extremely outdated wireless exposure “health” guidelines that were established 25 years ago, in 1996, when public exposure to wireless radiation was a tiny fraction of what it is today. The guidelines themselves only acknowledge possible harm from thermal effects (the exposure level it takes to heat human tissue), and completely ignore the large body of science (that even existed back then) pointing to non-thermal harms.

Almost 10 years ago, the U.S. Government Accountability Office published a recommendation that the FCC update its guidelines, which they had promised to do frequently when the guidelines were initially established, to reflect ever changing exposure levels. As a response, the FCC opened a docket for public comment, which over the next several years, filled up with thousands of scientific studies and individual testimonies claiming widespread harm from radio-frequency radiation to the health of humans, animals and the environment.

Several years later, the FCC closed the docket, and without addressing ANY of the comments, decided that its guidelines were still adequate to protect health and that they did not need to update them.

The lawsuit, which was filed very soon after the FCC’s decision, claims that the FCC’s refusal to address the vast mountain of evidence is arbitrary, capricious, not evidence-based, and an abuse of discretion. The court agreed with this in their final verdict. This accusation means that there is no rational connection between the facts found and the conclusions drawn, and they have “entirely failed to consider an important aspect of the problem,” and/or “offered an explanation for its decision that runs counter to the evidence before the agency.”

For clarity, the court’s decision didn’t state specifically that 5G and wireless radiation is harmful. It stated that the FCC failed to consider substantial evidence that these harms exist. In a certain sense, court’s decision implies that these harms exist and are valid, unless the FCC can prove otherwise.

To establish the case, the petitioners filed 11,000 pages of evidence of harm from 5G and wireless technology. The FCC is now tasked with addressing this evidence in a meaningful and rational way.

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., CHD chairman and attorney on the case, explains the deeper truth that spurred on the FCC’s actions and made it necessary to hold them accountable:

“The telecom industry, by subverting democracy, by corrupting public officials, by compromising the science, has built an industry on fraud. That does not mean that we can’t have a telecom industry that gives us very good cell phone service. We can have that and we can have safety, and we can have healthy children, too.

It’s just that they can make more money by taking shortcuts, by doing it cheaply, by ignoring the science, by corrupting public officials and subverting our democracy. They succeeded in turning two federal agencies, the FDA and the FCC, into models for agency capture. Those agencies no longer have any interest in protecting public health. They have become sock puppets for the industry that they are supposed to be regulating. The government and industry, they call their relationship a public-private partnership, and that should get us a little bit wary. They have made the space between government and regulators seamless, so you don’t know where one ends and the other begins. They’ve sold out the people of our country, they’ve sold out humanity, because everybody around the world looks to the FDA and FCC as the trusted regulators for science.

The 10,000 plus studies show that what they’re doing is horrendously dangerous. It’s doing terrible harm to human beings, to our brains, to our wildlife, to our health. They’ve taken all that and they’ve buried it.

What the court said to them today is, you cannot do that. You need to actually read the science. You need to do your job and protect public health.”

In the verdict, the court specifically referenced several aspects of evidence of harm that the FCC needs to address. They mentioned evidence on radiation sickness, electro-sensitivity (EHS), neurological effects, prenatal exposure, sperm damage, and damage to the blood-brain barrier. They mentioned oxidative stress, which has been established as a primary causal mechanism of harm. The court emphasized that the FCC failed to address evidence of harm to children, as well as inadequate testing procedures for cell phone radiation emission, the effects of long-term exposure, and the pulsation and modulation aspects of wireless radiation (how the data is transferred).

Interestingly, the court put a lot of emphasis on the FCC’s failure to address environmental harms. It’s likely that they gave this issue additional weight because one of the letters on the record was from another government agency. In 2014, the United States Department of the Interior wrote a letter expressing concern about the effects of cell phone towers on migratory birds, which also points out that the FCC guidelines are 30 years out of date. There is also a mass of other evidence included in the lawsuit indicating harm to plants, animals and the weather.


The FCC lost the case. What happens next?

The ball is back in the FCC’s court, and they are now tasked with either providing substantial evidence that supports their decision not to update their guidelines (which doesn’t exist), or to go to work on changing their guidelines to actually reflect not just increased modern exposure levels, but also non-thermal effects.

It’s possible that they will appeal the case, just to buy time, and continue rushing the implementation of more and more 5G antennas. Their decades-long strategy of ignoring the evidence that continues to pile up is only delaying the inevitable, so that may continue to be their only strategy for a while longer, putting their lies and deceit on a life support system to stave off death for another few breaths.

The alternative, which is actually changing their guidelines to reflect the truth of what we currently know to be the harms of wireless radiation, could send the whole wireless communications system as we know it into upheaval.

The telecoms would have to backtrack so far, and take down so many of their existing antennas and infrastructure because it will surely exceed healthy exposure levels, when these risks are finally acknowledged and officially admitted. They would have to recall most of the cell phones on the market, or at least provide public notices warning cell phone users of potential harm to their health and offering guidelines for safer use.

Or, if the cell phone companies are innovative and adaptable in any way, the best thing may be for them to actually utilize their own patents for technological additions to the phones that decrease exposure and increase safety!

These changes may be slow going. We have every reason to expect that the FCC will draw out this process as long as legally possible, because they are mainly concerned about the profits of the telecom companies that pull their strings, and do not actually care about the health of living organisms on this planet.

The favorable verdict of this case will most definitely affect several other active cases against the FCC and telecoms, including the 70+ active cases on brain tumors caused by cell phones, and the OTARD case that contests placing 5G repeater antennas on private properties without the consent of neighbors who will be affected by the radiation.

There are some kinds of changes that can happen far more quickly. This will be the general public’s crumbling respect for the FCC, one person at a time, now that the court system has acknowledged their inadequacies and corruption. Word of mouth is the most powerful force that will spread this awareness far and wide. For many people, “the FCC says it’s safe” has been the only reason they dismiss the increasing health concerns and continue to use their cell phones in unsafe ways, keep their Wifi routers turned on all the time, allow the installation of wireless “smart” meters on their properties, continue to buy myriad “smart” devices for their homes, and not consider utilizing effective forms of EMF protection.

The illusion of safety that the FCC has been using to prop up public confidence just crumbled, and everyone needs to hear about it.

The best thing all of us can do at this point is spread the word! If anyone has ever told you that wireless radiation is not a health concern because “the FCC says it’s safe”, send them this article. Share this information with your children’s school, and local government officials who are able to influence local laws. Word of mouth between individuals can make change far more quickly than the movement of these slow, cumbersome regulatory organizations. Also, the more awareness the public has about these issues, the more pressure we put on these organizations to address them and change their tune to support public and environmental health.

References:

“Historic Win’: CHD Wins Case Against FCC on Safety Guidelines for 5G and Wireless” – https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/chd-wins-case-fcc-safety-guidelines-5g-wireless/

United States Court of Appeals decision regarding EHT/CHD vs. FCC case – https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/chd-v-fcc-we-won-decision.pdf

“11,000 Pages of Evidence Filed in Landmark 5G Case Against the FCC” – https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/landmark-5g-case-against-fcc-hearing-set-jan-25/

“Watch Press Conference - CHD Historic Win Against FCC on 5G & Wireless Health Guidelines” – https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-vs-fcc-aug-16

It was recently announced that the Starlink 5G satellite internet service by SpaceX will begin full, global commercial service next month (August 2021). The Starlink satellites have been consistently deployed into low Earth orbit since May of 2019, when the first 60 operational satellites were launched. Sixty satellites are being launched at a time, about every two weeks, with the goal being over 1,500 satellites in low Earth orbit by the time full service begins in August.

They aren’t nearly finished, however. The FCC already approved the launch and operation of 12,000 Starlink satellites, and just recently approved an additional 30,000! This is on top of one million Earth-based satellite uplinks (ground hubs) to connect the radiation beams from the spacecraft to ground users!

All of these antennas combined will result in a massive increase in radiation, mainly focused towards areas with “poor internet service”, a.k.a. rural areas, wilderness, and remote islands and forests. These remote, pristine reaches of the Earth have become rare in their purity and beauty, and soon even these sanctuaries will become infused with manmade, biologically harmful frequencies.

Ironically, the target clientele for this satellite service are those with poor internet access who live in rural areas. Many of these people have specifically chosen to live away from cities because they do NOT want to live in a radiation soup, and moved to a rural area with no coverage or poor coverage specifically to find peace of mind and heal their bodies.

The Starlink satellite service has been in the beta test phase for ground users interested in receiving high-speed satellite internet service for almost a year now. There are currently over 70,000 active beta testers in 12 countries. More than half a million people have already put down a deposit for the full service when it’s officially activated next month.

Will satellite service activation greatly increase EMF related symptoms?

The question we need to be asking now, is will the activation of 5G satellite service from space greatly increase EMF related symptoms in sensitive individuals, and possibly even cause symptoms in others who weren’t previously sensitive to EMFs?

Based on the level of magnitude of service coverage planned, with more than 5 megawatts of combined power focused into millions of powerful beams, it is likely that this occurrence will amplify EMF and 5G related symptoms of illness.

Just like ground based 5G service, these 5G satellites will use phased array antennas and beamforming, allowing a multitude of focused beams to strategically bounce off objects to quickly reach their destination devices. The 5G satellites will operate in a higher frequency spectrum than the currently operational ground 5G antennas. Most ground based antennas do not currently exceed 28 GHz (gigahertz), with most being half that or even lower (6-18 GHz seems common). The satellites will operate between 12 GHz and 75 GHz, which is moving into the true millimeter wave range.

For a greater understanding of how 5G works and what risks it poses to our health, you can read our previous article focused specifically on 5G:

5G Explained and What It Means for Health and Humanity

A primary concern is how millimeter waves have a particular affinity for sweat ducts on human skin. It has been shown that these sweat ducts actually act as helical antennas for millimeter wave radiation, channeling it deep into the body. With the way the radiation from these phased array antennas will bounce off objects en route to the receiving antennas, the more devices that begin to utilize the satellite service, the more it is possible that these powerful beams will unintentionally cross paths with unsuspecting human bystanders.

Depending on one’s sensitivity level and the power of the beam, it may even cause a slight burning sensation of the skin, because the skin contains a large concentration of nerve endings. The military owns a Directed Energy Weapon for crowd control which utilizes 95 GHz millimeter waves to cause an intense burning sensation on the skin, causing rioters and protesters to disperse reflexively. This weapon uses much higher power than 5G antenna beams, but the frequencies themselves are close to the same, so the antenna beams could cause remnants of the same type of symptoms. The antennas may even have worse effects over time than the weapon, due to more continuous or repeated exposure.

Even more significantly than direct contact with a 5G satellite beam is the way all these frequency beams are going to affect the ionosphere of the Earth itself. The ionosphere of the Earth holds a very specific and delicate electrical charge, which holds the balance of all life on Earth. In ways we are just starting to understand, humans and all other life forms rely on this natural electromagnetism to hold and maintain the complex symphony of life on Earth.

What needs to happen is close and detailed monitoring of the electrical properties of the ionosphere as this satellite service begins, to see how it changes, and how all life on Earth is subsequently affected. If this is being monitored and something goes awry, these satellite "constellation" companies should be held accountable.

Due to serious concerns about the brightness and reflectivity of the satellites and how this may considerably impact astronomy, SpaceX is reportedly now working with astronomical organizations to make changes to the satellites that will hopefully lessen the impact on the night sky. Also, due to the concerns many scientists have about adding tens of thousands of satellites into low Earth orbit causing collisions that result in innumerable levels of space debris, there are changes being made to decrease this possibility, as well.

If all the companies launching these satellites are willing to take these concerns into consideration, the monitoring of the ionosphere of the Earth absolutely needs to be considered, as well!

The truth is, this is a brand new experiment, and all living organisms on Earth are the test subjects. We do not currently know how extensively the addition of these high powered, high frequency satellite antennas will affect humans, animals, insects and plant life.

SpaceX/Starlink CEO fully denies radiofrequency radiation harms

Elon Musk, the CEO of SpaceX (which controls the Starlink satellites), recently publicly denied any harm from radiofrequency radiation, in an absurd and fantastical statement.

On a podcast where he was a guest, he was asked for his thoughts about the widespread concerns about the harms of cell phone and radiofrequency radiation. Regarding 5G, he says, “don’t worry about it.” Then he literally states that if he had “… a helmet of cell phones strapped around my head, and around my nuts, I would not worry.” Then, “phones are not causing cancer, it’s not a problem.”

He goes on to explain that the people who are concerned that cell phones are harmful are thinking of “nuclear bombs”, and confusing these ionizing radiation sources with cell phones. This is a diversionary tactic, as almost everyone who is concerned about cell phone radiation already knows the difference between ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. The thousands of studies on the harms of cell phones were all done specifically on non-ionizing radiation, which contrary to mainstream belief, results in its own type of cell damage through distinct mechanisms that are related to, but not the same as, the damage from ionizing radiation sources like nuclear bombs.

These tactics sound exactly like the ones the FCC and telecommunications companies have been using for decades. They never admit that there’s “possible” harm, they never say (in the spirit of inquiry and objective truth seeking) “we will explore the possibility”. In fact, the more incriminating studies that are published, the more they deny any harm at all, in an absolute and grandiose fashion. They are now literally denying thousands of studies showing harm from RF radiation, including DNA damage and cancer, and dismissing the over 70 active lawsuits against the FCC and telecoms alleging that their technology caused brain cancer in the lawsuits’ plaintiffs and their loved ones.

What do all of these staunch deniers of radiation harm have in common? They all make very large amounts of money (millions or even billions of dollars) off of the technology causing the harm. There is no way they will admit that their own products are harmful, no matter how much evidence indicates with certainty that it is. Meanwhile, thousands of scientists and doctors who have no skin in the game financially are alarmed by the results of the ever growing body of science showing a wide range of biological harms, and just want to see the truth publicly admitted so that people sick from radiation can seek solutions and become well again.

What can we do now?

These satellites have already been launched into space, and it seems that this high speed internet-from-space will be unleashed on a large scale, whether we want it or not. The 5G ground antennas have already been built, and are already providing service to 5G enabled phones, and other devices. It is already happening.

What can we do? We need to seek peace of mind, find an inner wellspring of hope and faith in an eventual positive outcome, and to protect ourselves and our families during this time of extreme level experiments on humanity and the Earth.

Keep as much distance as you can from unnecessary sources of radiation, and use your Blushield. If you are specifically concerned about the higher frequency range of high band 5G (above 40 GHz), the Premium devices are designed to help the body (and other living organisms) regenerate from the intense effect of high band and close range 5G exposure. Know that your Blushield protected area is also a sanctuary for your pets, and the wildlife around your home, including migratory birds, bees, butterflies, and healthy soil bacteria.

Spread the word about what is happening to everyone you know, including local politicians, so that they can become aware of the seriousness of this issue and begin to shape policy in a way that could eventually change humanity’s path for the better.

The most important thing of all is to focus on strengthening your own biofield, through heart-centered spiritual/religious practice, laughter, love, friendship, high quality healthy food and water, and by surrounding yourself with coherent frequencies from Blushield, uplifting music, and taking frequent trips into nature!

Among the civilized world, many people are feeling excited by the many possible applications of 5G wireless technology, and how it proposes to make our lives easier and better. From numerous automated smart devices that are designed to fill up our houses and act as tiny robotic servants (including smart ovens, doorbells, thermostats and even beds!), to the wider societal applications of self-driving vehicles and augmented and virtual reality, companies and creative individuals are all jumping into the game with ideas of their own on how they can take advantage of 5G services to create and profit from new types of technology.

An unusual and unlikely application is being explored at large scale dairy cow farms. Apparently, dairy cow farmers are having a difficult time keeping up with the many daily tasks and needs of the herd, including timely milking and feeding, and monitoring the health of each individual cow for signs of disease.

A herd of dairy cows in England have been volunteered to be an experiment in how 5G connectivity can change the daily operations of a farm. Each cow wears a 5G-connected collar, which interacts with an automated robotic milking system. When the cow feels the pressure of milk building up, they can enter machine gates that automatically open for them, and the automated milking device, which recognizes each individual cow, will latch on and milk the cow as the cow munches on food as a reward.

Each cow also wears a 5G-enabled ear tag that monitors their health, and can instantly transmit signs of distress. Among other technologies the farm is experimenting with are “automated brushes that rotate when the cow rubs up against them, sensor-operated curtains that open depending on the weather, and a smart feeding system that automatically delivers food in the barn via ceiling-mounted rails.”

The herd is a total of 180 cows, but only 50 of them are fitted with these smart devices. We would be very curious to see how the health of these 50 cows, in the short and long term, compares with the other 130 that are not wearing these wireless radiation emitting devices.

However, due to the narrowly focused goals that these types of experiments are done for (and fervent and pervasive belief that 5G can only be a good thing), it’s extremely unlikely that any negative health effects on the cows exposed to the radiation will be reported, or even recorded.  

Dairy cows are vulnerable to negative effects from wireless radiation

Just like all biological life, the bodies and brains of dairy cows (and all mammals) have finely tuned, sensitive bio-electrical fields that control and direct every aspect of their body functions. Therefore, just like all biological life, they are sensitive to and affected by external electromagnetic fields. There have also been studies specifically on the effects of EMFs on cows and their calves.

One study showed that calves that are in close proximity to mobile phone base stations during gestation, especially in the first trimester, are significantly more likely to develop cataracts. 32% of the calves developed cataracts, and 3.6% of them were severe. Another study showed that calves born near a mobile phone base station had a 3.5 times higher risk for heavy cataracts, compared with the Swiss average. This was found to be due to oxidative stress, and there was an association between oxidative stress and the distance to the nearest cell phone mast.  

Blushield testing shows that dairy cows benefit from EMF protection

Several years back, when EMF levels were considerably lower than they are now, but still present in the environment even in rural areas, Blushield did some tests on dairy cows specifically. A Blushield device was plugged into the dairy barn for lengths of time, and then removed for other lengths of time, for the purpose of testing the effects that having EMF protection would have on the milk of the cows. The entire herd was monitored for several months.

When milk is received at a dairy processing plant, it is always tested for something called somatic cell count. This refers to the number of white blood cells in the milk, which can show whether a cow is healthy, or having biological stress (from injury or disease) that’s causing a strong immune reaction. Somatic cells, or white blood cells, are what the immune system produces to deal with stress and fight invaders like viruses and bacteria.

All milk contains some amount of somatic cells, as white blood cells will always be present even in a healthy cow, for health maintenance on a daily basis. However, when you see elevated levels, this can indicate sickness or injury.

The results of Blushield’s somatic cell count tests were significant, and consistent. With the Blushield plugged in, the somatic cell counts recorded were consistently about one-third of what they were with no Blushield present! Cows (and other animals) are not affected by psychosomatic factors, unlike humans, whose beliefs can influence their outcomes. This is one reason animal studies are so powerful.

You can read more about Blushield’s tests on dairy cow somatic cell counts here.

Conclusion

The human obsession with progress at any cost, and the common human flaw of having tunnel vision (not seeing the big picture full effect of one action), often backfires. It may be that wanting so badly to automate the systems at these dairy farms, and monitor their health down to exacting detail in real time, could negatively affect their health and milk production! It’s likely that increasing wireless connectivity is going to have a strong effect on the somatic cell count of the milk of these dairy cows, creating long term health issues in the cows and decreasing the milk quality for dairy consumers.

It’s time that these companies who are so fixated on innovation and progress consider the full implications of their products. As they experiment with these new types of systems, it would be easy for them to test the health effects of the increased radiation exposure as an integrated part of their experiment.

Blushield EMF protection is a great addition to any small or large scale farming operation, as our initial tests with dairy cows and egg-laying chickens have demonstrated. It can significantly increase the well being and quality of life of the animals, as well as increase the quality and quantity of the farm’s production. Animals are often sensitive, and react very quickly, to the presence of a Blushield, as they are purely instinctive in their responses to environmental changes. It’s important that we do everything we can to protect animals (as well as plants and insects) from harmful EMFs, as they are innocent bystanders to humanity’s wireless experiments.  

References:

“5G-connected cows test milking parlor of the future” – https://www.reuters.com/article/us-telecoms-5g-cows/5g-connected-cows-test-milking-parlor-of-the-future-idUSKCN1RN1IY

“Radiofrequency EMFs and Health Risks Section 6: Animals, Birds, Insects and Plants” – https://www.powerwatch.org.uk/library/downloads/rf-emfs-6-animals-2018-11.pdf

Blushield’s Dairy Cow Somatic Cell Count Tests – https://www.blushield.com/testing/dairy-cow-tests/?v=3e8d115eb4b3

You may have already heard about the link between cell phones and brain tumors, as several of our past articles have covered this topic from various angles. Cell phone radiation has been shown in hundreds of studies to increase a person’s likelihood of developing several types of cancer, including glioblastomas, which are an aggressive and deadly type of brain tumor. The body of science that proves this is increasing each year, and although the government regulatory entities and cell phone companies seem more intent than ever on covering this up, this truth has been trickling out into public awareness anyway.

Did you know there are currently over 70 active lawsuits against the cell phone companies from individuals who got brain cancer from cell phone radiation? Some of these cases have been sitting in the state and federal court system with very little progress for over 20 years! The defendants in these cases, which include most of the cell phone developers and service providers, as well as regulatory agencies like the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) and CTIA (Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association), have been taking advantage of some unethical loopholes in the law to keep these cases from progressing to evidentiary hearings and jury trials for as long as they possibly can, both of which would incriminate them beyond any doubt.

They are just delaying the inevitable. The truth is getting out there, and it won’t stay hidden from the mainstream awareness forever!  

Fatal brain cancer case in Louisiana could change the game

A new case was just filed in April of 2021, for the wrongful death of a 49-year-old Louisiana pastor, who used cell phones for 25 years. He developed an aggressive glioblastoma, which refers to stage 4 cancer of the glial cells in the brain, at the beginning of 2019. After many surgeries and therapies, loss of his ability to live life with any semblance of normalcy to the great devastation of this man, his wife and two sons, he passed away at the end of 2020.

His name was Frank Aaron Walker, and this case is known in short as Walker vs. Motorola, although the defendants include a total of 9 separate but interconnected companies and regulatory agencies who were all complicit in the fraud and deceit alleged in this case.

His wife and sons, who are the plaintiffs in this case, allege that the way Frank Allen Walker used cell phones for 25 years was promoted as safe, normal and completely harmless, and if he had known of the dangers, he would have used cell phones more safely or not at all. In the case, the evidence is laid out that proves that these companies have known for decades about the harms of cell phone radiation, and have continually chosen to hide this knowledge from cell phone users and the general public.

The family is represented by Hunter Lundy of Lundy, Lundy, Soileau & South, LLP, one of the leading personal injury law firms in the country, and by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., chairman and chief legal counsel for Children’s Health Defense (CHD). Both Lundy and Kennedy are also involved in other active cases on the health effects of wireless radiation.

For this case, they chose to file it in a Federal court in Louisiana. Most of the other 70+ active cases that are currently slow going were filed in a State court in D.C., and since the Federal courts are subject to a different process than the State courts, this case could proceed much more quickly than the other cases, potentially even helping to move the other ones forward! To learn more about how this works and the complex legalities of the court processes in general and these cases in particular, listen to this interview with Hunter Lundy by Dafna Tachover of Children’s Health Defense.

The main goal that will likely help all of these cases to break through is to get a solid evidentiary hearing, where expert scientists can explain to the court the large body of science, from older studies to very new ones, proving that cell phone radiation is harmful and can cause brain tumors. There are an impressive number of respectable scientists from all over the world that are ready to do this, as soon as an evidentiary hearing can be organized for these cases. If a jury is allowed to hear this out, there will be no way that these companies can continue to deceive the public, and the truth will come out.

History shows that with toxic products the public has been deceived into believing are safe for decades by corporations and the government, such as cigarettes and glyphosate (Monsanto’s RoundUp), the tide finally turned once one or more jury trials were allowed to happen. Regular people with common sense, when they hear the full deluge of evidence of harm, are no longer deceived by smooth marketing slogans and the attempted debunking of solid science and discrediting of respectable scientists.  

The dirty history of telecom & government dismissal of wireless harms

Most people don’t know how long this has been going on, and how deep the corruption goes. This lawsuit lays it all out, and it is shocking. You can even read this 69-page Walker vs. Motorola case yourself, if you want to get the full story!

The lawsuit details numerous peer-reviewed scientific studies, including U.S. government funded studies, that show that cell phone radiation causes cancer (as well as DNA damage, which is a precursor to cancer). The plaintiffs allege that the telecom industry has misrepresented the scientific evidence, suppressed credible evidence and and has conspired to conceal or alter results of studies.

In several instances over the past three decades, credible scientists were hired by the telecom industry to do studies to “prove” that cell phone use was safe. Every single time, their findings showed otherwise, and in every case, when industry didn’t like the results the scientists gave them, they went to work to make sure the study was never published, and if the scientist refused to be silent and said they would report the results anyway, industry then spent much effort to destroy that scientist’s reputation.

One example was the work of Henry Lai, PhD, in 1994. He was hired by the CTIA, Motorola and other telecommunications companies to conduct studies demonstrating the safety of cell phones. However, the experiments he did ended up showing DNA damage from radiation similar to what cell phones use. They did everything they could to prevent those studies from being published, and when that didn’t work, they tried hard to discredit the scientific reputation of Dr. Lai. To this day, Henry Lai’s industry funded studies are among the best and most incriminating, especially considering the opposite results were expected by those who originally funded the studies!

After Lai’s findings disappointed the industry, they hired other researchers to attempt to disprove these unfavorable results. Again, subsequent research confirmed Lai’s findings, which they also refused to publish.

The science proving wireless harms is still rolling out at a steady pace, and some of the most significant results yet have come out only in recent years, while these cases have been sitting in the courts waiting for action. In 2011, the IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) examined the entire body of research on wireless radiation, then decided to classify it as a Class 2B Possible Carcinogen. At the time, they stated that the only reason it was considered “Possible” instead of a “Probable Carcinogen” (Class 2A) was a lack of animal studies. In their estimation, every angle of research, including extensive human epidemiological studies, had indicated wireless radiation as cancer causing, and all they needed was more animal studies to make for a more certain judgment.

Since that time, the two most thorough and comprehensive animal studies have been published. The most notorious is the NTP (National Toxicology Program) study, which was a long term (10 year) and very expensive ($30 million in taxpayer money) government commissioned study. Just like the studies mentioned in this article previously, their stated motive for this study was to “finally put to rest” the idea that cell phones cause cancer, and to prove their safety. The study results showed the opposite, pointing specifically to widespread DNA damage in rats and mice, as well as gliomas of the brain (what Frank Walker had) and schwannomas of the heart.

After seemingly being surprised and even alarmed by the initial findings, spokespersons for these government organizations did a one-eighty and decided not to announce the findings publicly, besides a short explanation on the FDA website downplaying the importance of the study, stating that the animal study won’t apply to humans. This bold and contradictory statement was made after the IARC had announced that they need animal studies specifically, to further prove wireless harms. Also, this study’s design and implementation was flawless, and done with utmost quality and care to ensure that this will apply to humans. You can read more about the NTP study on wireless radiation in our previous article on the topic.

A couple years ago, results from another large, long-term study at the Ramazzini Institute in Italy were published that replicate the results of the NTP study. This study on over 2,400 rodents also found central and peripheral nervous system cancers (specifically gliomas and schwannomas) from exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Scientists aware of the results of both studies are strongly recommending that the IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) reclassify radiofrequency radiation from “possible” to a “probable” human carcinogen.

We have all the science we need to show with absolute certainty that wireless radiation is harmful to living organisms. Now we just need the platform to get the information out there and hold these companies liable, which is what a proper evidentiary hearing and jury trial will be for these court cases!  

The telecoms have patents for cell phone safety technology, which they never implemented

Perhaps the biggest insult in all of this is the little known fact that these cell phone companies have already created technology that would make cell phones safer, but this technology was never implemented. They know how to make cell phones safer. This means they also know that cell phone radiation is inherently harmful. If it wasn’t, why would they investigate safety devices? There are at least 14 actual U.S. patents for these devices, applied for and received by the manufacturers. However, they failed to ever implement these upgrades into the design of their phones! It’s easy to guess that the reason for this is because if they add these things in, that would be a public admission of the inherent harm of their products, which they have insisted for decades doesn’t exist. Making cell phones safer now would be admitting that they have been lying for 20-30 years, which would automatically incriminate them for thousands of potential personal injury and wrongful death cases. It would be a mess, and may even put them out of business. So instead, they continue to promote that the way cell phones are commonly used is “completely safe”. Nothing to see here.

Almost all of these patents were applied for in the ‘90s. That is a very long time to be aware of the harms of a product, as well as the solution, and to still do nothing about it! Here are a few examples from the lawsuit text:

• On October 24, 1991, Hitachi received a patent to reduce the cell phone user’s exposure to RF radiation “to prevent the health of the user from being injured.”
• On August 11, 1992, Mitsubishi was issued a patent for a cordless telephone designed to “reduce the effect of an electromagnetic wave onto a head of a human body” by coating the handset with shielding material on the side closest to the user’s head.
• On December 26, 1995, Motorola filed a patent application for an antenna with an electromagnetic shield which results in “little to no radiation directed toward the body of the user.”
• On April 9, 1996, a patent issued to Kevin and Norval Luxon for a shield apparatus which utilizes electromagnetic radiation absorbing materials “disposed about the antenna and portable wireless transmitting apparatus and between the user and the antenna and transmitting apparatus to shield or protect the user from the potentially harmful radiation emissions from the wireless communication apparatus.”
• On July 28, 1998, Nokia received a patent for a shielding layer between the antenna and the user to reduce the electromagnetic irradiation of the user. The application says the cell phone antenna is a “few centimeters from the brain, the hearing organs, and the organ of equilibrium. Although a direct heating effect could be left without further consideration, it has been suggested that modulated RF radiation induces changes in the electrical status, i.e., in the ion balance of nerve cells. A continuous localized exposure to radio frequency irradiation has been suggested to weaken myelin sheath of cells and to eventually lead to an impairment of hearing capability, vertigo, etc. It has been suggested that radio frequency irradiation may stimulate extra growth among supportive cells in the nerve system, which in the worst case it has been suggested could [lead] to a development of malignant tumor, e.g., glioma form supportive cells.”

There are several more examples similar to this. They have known all along about the harms of their products.  

What happens next with the cell phone brain tumor court cases?

As we explained earlier, many of the currently active court cases are happening in the Superior Court for the District of Columbia, which is a State court. The first one was filed in 2001, and since then, 12 of the later cases have been consolidated with the first one for the purposes of an upcoming evidentiary hearing. The first case is referred to, in short, as Murray vs. Motorola, so all 13 consolidated cases are now under that name. The evidentiary hearing for this group of cases is scheduled for July of 2021. The hearing will determine which of the plaintiff’s experts are considered qualified to testify in trial, by deciding if their opinions are based on scientifically reliable evidence.

Until this hearing, none of the other 70 cases in State court will be allowed to proceed. However, the Walker vs. Motorola case that was filed in Federal court in Louisiana in April will proceed separately from these other cases.

Another issue that is holding back the Murray cases is that after a particularly powerful document was submitted this March by the plaintiffs, a 176-page expert opinion by Dr. Christopher Portier, the defendants responded by requesting that no evidence that was not in existence in 2013 should be allowed. Their stated reasoning is convoluted: 2013 was when the first evidentiary hearing in these cases happened, where they approved 5 out of 8 of the plaintiff’s experts, but then the court changed the standard they abide by for expert opinions (from Frye to Daubert), which ended up delaying the progress of these cases by an additional 7 years for various reasons. It’s obvious to us that the real reason they made this request is because they’re afraid of letting Dr. Portier speak, and because some of the biggest scientific blows to the cell phone industry’s safety claims have come since 2013!

Christopher Portier was the director of the National Center for Environmental Health at the CDC, associate director of the National Institute for Health and Environmental Science and associate director of the National Toxicology Program (NTP). He is also a scientific advisor for the World Health Organization (WHO), and was a member of the IARC working group that classified wireless radiation as a Group 2B Possible Carcinogen in 2011.

Those are some pretty major credentials.

Dr. Portier states in the conclusion of his report, “In my opinion, RF exposure probably causes gliomas and neuromas and, given the human and experimental evidence, I assert that, to a reasonable degree of scientific certainty, the probability that RF exposure causes gliomas and neuromas is high.”

Now the court in the Murray cases has to decide whether to allow Portier’s testimony, as well as other post-2013 evidence. With the Walker case in Louisiana, this evidence is already part of the initial lawsuit, so this case is not bound by this same limitation. Therefore, it may progress much more quickly, possibly even paving the way for all the other cases to move forward, as well.

As of June 2021 in the Walker vs. Motorola case, the initial papers have been served to the defendants and they are awaiting a response. We will keep you updated on the progress of this case (and all of the others)!

The truth coming out is inevitable. It is just a matter of time!  

References:

Children’s Health Defense: “Family Sues Telecom Giants, Alleging They Hid Risks of Cell Phone Radiation That Caused Man’s Brain Cancer” – https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/lawsuit-telecom-giants-cell-phone-radiation-brain-cancer/

“April Marie Walker, et al., v. Motorola Mobility, LLC, et al.” – https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/april_walker_complaint.pdf

When you first decided to invest in a Blushield device, your most likely motivation was to protect yourself and your family from harmful EMFs. With the large coverage area of protection that all of our stationary home units have, one home device will more than cover the area of your entire home (even if your home is larger than average), as well as your front and back yards. Then add a Portable to the mix so you can bring this field of beneficial frequencies wherever you go, and you are golden!

Going beyond the protection that Blushield offers directly to its users and their families, have you ever thought about the influence your Blushield is having on others around you? You are actually doing more than just protecting yourself and your family from EMFs. You have literally become a carrier of biologically beneficial, coherent frequencies!

Whether other people in your life are aware of it or not, they are likely being benefited in some way by their exposure to your Blushield. Many people these days have an “out of sight, out of mind” sort of mindset, and the invisible frequencies their body is being constantly bathed in do not even cross their mind. Or they assume that if it's not ionizing radiation (like x-rays and gamma rays), then it's not bioactive and can't possibly affect them.

Even if they never think about it or don't believe they're affected, and whether or not they are sensitive enough to feel it tangibly, those people are still being affected by the EMFs that are all around us. Our physical bodies are highly complex electrochemical organisms. We emit our own electromagnetic fields, mainly in scalar form (often called “bio-scalar”), and these fractal, implosive, self-generated frequencies interact with and initiate the chemical processes our bodies undergo to remain alive and vital. Even a tiny fluctuation in our personal “energy field” can significantly alter a number of cellular processes.

Just as we are highly responsive to our self-generated electromagnetic fields, we are also extremely receptive to external ones! This includes the natural electromagnetic fields that we have evolved with, such as the Schumann resonances (standing waves occurring between the Earth and the ionosphere that are excited by lightning strikes) and the multi-layered frequency patterns emitted by natural elements like the air we breathe (which has different compositions depending on your climate and altitude), the ocean and other bodies of water, as well as trees, other plant life, and even natural bacterial and mycelial colonies that predominate in any given area!

Likewise, our electrochemical bodies are highly responsive to the manmade frequencies that are now all around us, 24/7. One important and well studied example of this is how our voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) are affected by external pulse modulated frequencies, overstimulating them and causing them to dump calcium into the insides of our cells, which in itself triggers a cascade of other unintended and inappropriate biological actions. If you want to know more about this, you can read more about Dr. Martin Pall's work on EMFs & VGCCs here.

Due to our innate sensitivity, anyone who knowingly or unknowingly enters a field of biologically beneficial frequencies, such as those emitted by Blushield's nature-based multiple waveform scalar field, will be positively affected in some way.

We have had customers report that their house guests will mention that it “feels peaceful” in their home, or express passing comments reporting increased general well being without attributing it to a known source.

When driving a car while carrying one of the larger coverage range Portables, the behavior of other drivers in your vicinity can be subtly improved, and you may notice less crazy/erratic driving happening around you.

When you're carrying a Portable while out and about, and interacting with any number of people in passing, you may even notice generally improved moods, and a more peaceful and rational demeanor in those around you. In most cases it will be subtle, since their body is just beginning to pick up on the coherent frequencies of Blushield, and hasn't had enough time to go through the full entrainment process that comes with sustained, consistent exposure, like you have. However, even if it's just a subtle and brief influence in someone's day, you never know how this will affect them in the long run. Sometimes even small and brief events can become catalysts for positive change in someone's life!

You Are Protecting Wildlife

One particular “side effect” of using Blushield devices that we are especially passionate about is how Blushield protected zones can create a type of sanctuary for wildlife. In this day and age, when manmade radiofrequency radiation is coming close to blanketing the whole Earth (and will be even more soon when 5G satellite services become fully active), some of the most important life forms on Earth have become unintended casualties.

Bee and bird populations are declining in EMF-heavy areas, especially since 5G has been launched, and trees suddenly become diseased or die when 5G repeaters are installed on or near them. When bees start to die, the majority of our food crops are no longer being adequately pollinated, which results in crop decline or failure. A decline in the bird population can create imbalances in the insect population, which the birds would normally keep in check. A decline in smaller birds starves the larger predator birds like eagles, owls and hawks, and forces them to relocate.

Incoherent, manmade EMFs even affect the bacterial composition of the soil, decreasing beneficial bacteria species and promoting the growth of opportunistic (“bad”) bacteria. This can result in bacterial imbalances in the soil and even in the “internal soil” of our bodies. The effects on soil can negatively influence plant growth, and the effects on our bodies can cause gut problems and affect nutrient absorption and utilization, cause mood/attention/memory issues (via the gut/brain connection), as well as a variety of other systemic issues. After all, our bodies are composed 90% of a large variety of bacteria, and only 10% actual human cells!

When you have a Blushield stationary home unit plugged into your home, especially the larger coverage area Cube and Ultra (or their Premium counterparts), you have a scalar field of coherent frequencies of an almost 600 foot diameter! This very large field will provide coverage quite a ways past the walls of your home, and any living organism residing within this 600-foot sphere will be positively affected. Birds, bees and other important species can take refuge and make their homes in these coherent spaces, raising babies and rebuilding their populations.

Animals and insects are especially sensitive to Blushield's coherent scalar field, since they don't have the deeply ingrained mental programs that humans have that override pure perception and instinct. We have heard many reports of house pets like dogs and cats' health issues, behavior and sleep patterns improving once their owner introduces a Blushield into the home. One of our customers has a small dog that was having seizures, and just a few days after plugging in her first Blushield, her dog stopped having seizures and hasn't had one since! We have heard about horses that suddenly express interest and curiosity when their handlers have a Blushield Portable in their pocket. We have also heard of house plant growth increasing, and a reduction in mold growth in houses that introduced a Blushield.

We cannot say with certainty that any of these results will be seen in all cases, as there are many unrelated factors that strongly influence these circumstances, but we absolutely think Blushield is a helpful influence on all biological life forms! Our Poultry Farm Chicken Study and Dairy Cow Study are great examples of how Blushield positively affects animals. The best thing about witnessing results on animals is that they are not susceptible to psychosomatic factors, i.e. having varied results depending on belief or disbelief.

Conclusion

We still strongly believe in EMF related activism to help save the health of humans and other biological life forms, as there are currently only small pockets of Blushield protected spaces, and the irradiation of the rest of the Earth needs to stop for true global health and healing to occur.

We see Blushield as a tool that each of us can use NOW, while we are fighting the bigger fight. We want to protect ourselves and our families' health and energy levels as well as we can, while we are all working towards positive change on a worldwide scale.

It is one simple action step that each of us can choose to take, and we know that small actions can, over time, ripple out into the greater world and create cascading effects of great change!

Do you know if 5G service is in your neighborhood yet, and if the antennas and repeaters are close enough to your home and workplace to potentially affect your health?

If you don’t know for sure, or if you have just heard vague mentions of 5G coming to your area, is there a way to find out more specifically if 5G is really being deployed in your area yet, how many antenna transmitters are currently installed, and what frequencies the antennas are emitting?

This information actually is available to the public, but you have to know how to find it!

This article is a tutorial on how to do that.

If you read our recent article, 5G Explained & What it Means for Health & Humanity, then you know that 5G builds on current 4G infrastructure so that it can use 4G’s lower frequencies to reach further distances where necessary. Additionally, 5G will introduce “densification”, which means placing new antennas that emit higher frequencies, which don’t reach as far as lower frequencies, at much closer distances (300 feet or less between antennas), adding “density” to the overall number of towers in any given area. The more population dense an area is (large cities and metropolitan areas will have lots of this already), the more antennas and repeaters will be packed into each square mile, to provide uninterrupted service to the vastly larger number of devices that are expected to be utilizing 5G services in the near future.

To assist our Blushield customers in acquiring the appropriate strength Blushield device(s) for the level of EMF exposure of their living situation, we often utilize an online database called AntennaSearch.com.

On the website of this valuable resource, you can enter any address (your home, workplace, or any other address you are curious about) into their online form, and it will search the database for all the cell phone towers and antennas within 3 miles of the address entered.

It even includes very specific details about each tower and antenna, such as the exact distance from the requested address, the height of the tower structure or antenna from the ground, what company or individual owns the tower/antenna, what service it provides, and which frequencies the antennas use.

The information this database provides may have been intended to be used to determine cell service signal strength potential for any given place, but you can also use it to determine your specific, localized EMF exposure from cell tower wireless radiation!

How To Use Antenna Search to Determine Cell Tower EMF Exposure

Go to AntennaSearch.com, and you will see a page that looks similar to the one above. Type your address into the search box – you will have to type in a street address, city and state (zip code optional). Then press “Submit”.

Once the results are processed, you will see a screen like the one above, which says “Results Summary” at the top. Underneath that, it will list the number of cell towers and antennas that are within 3 miles of your address, which in this case is 77 towers and 476 antennas.

Towers are generally large structures where radiation-emitting antennas are placed. The towers themselves do not emit radiation, but this number is important because it indicates the total antenna-containing large structures in your vicinity. Each tower usually contains several (or many) antennas, to support service for several different telecom companies.

Antennas refer to the individual antennas that are on large tower structures (usually several to many per tower), as well as standalone antennas installed on lamp posts, buildings, trees, and other lower structures.

Just viewing and interpreting these results may give you the information you need, especially for choosing one or more Blushield devices that are suitable for your home and workplace. Our Blushield Product Guide covers this in more detail, and explains how to choose a device based on the number of towers and antennas within 3 miles of your address.

If you want to go further and find out how many of those antennas are emitting 5G signals, keep reading!

How To Find 5G Antennas In Your Neighborhood

If you want to know even more about the antennas near your home or workplace, start with the AntennaSearch Report you already generated. Scroll down the list of towers and antennas on the left side of the results page, until you get to the list of multiple and single antennas:

The map on the right side of the page will show the exact location of all the antennas in your local area, within 3 miles of your address. You can enlarge this map to see areas up close by holding down the control (ctrl) button on your keyboard while simultaneously using your mouse roller wheel to zoom in and out. Then you can click on individual antennas for more information. This is a good way to visually explore antenna information. On the map, the location of your house (or whatever address you searched) isn't specifically indicated, but it's right in the middle of the 3-mile radius circle indicated on the map.

The list on the left side of the page is of every single antenna the database found. The first part of the list is called “multiple”, meaning a large antenna structure (usually a tower) with multiple antennas that are often owned by different companies and emit different frequencies.

If you scroll further down the list, there’s a section labeled “single”. These are all the individual antennas placed on their own in various locations that are lower to the ground, such as on lamp posts, buildings and trees, and not sharing a structure with other antennas.

The above image is just the first few single antennas on this particular list. There are 476 total antennas on this list! This example is from a very EMF dense area in Orlando, Florida. The search results in your area may look considerably different than this one.

Now let’s see what happens when you click on a link for an individual antenna listing.

Here is an example image of the details of one of the antenna results. As you can see, this one provides Sprint wireless service, and is owned by a company called Clearwire Spectrum Holdings. The most important piece of information on individual antenna listings is at the bottom, in the box under where it says “Transmitter Frequencies”. This shows how many individual antennas are contained inside the antenna array, and what frequencies they operate at. It shows the frequency results in Mhz, which means megahertz. 1,000 megahertz is the same as 1 (one) gigahertz (GHz). The GHz frequencies are where you start getting into the faster, higher frequency 5G emissions.

Notice that the two frequencies emitted from this antenna are listed as 21,825 and 21,975 megahertz. This can be easily converted to 21.8 and 22 GHz, and definitely indicates a 5G antenna.

Go back through your results and look at a few other antennas. Some may also be in this tens of thousands of Mhz range, which means GHz, which means 5G. Others will say something like “800.685” Mhz. Take off everything after the period, and that’s just about 800 Mhz, which most likely indicates a longer range, lower frequency 4G emission. Note that 5G software can also emit frequencies down in the 400-900 Mhz range, which overlaps the 4G spectrum, but these so-called “low band” 5G frequencies will likely have very similar effects on the body as the current 4G radiation. It is a longer wavelength, lower frequency, which travels further and is somewhat less intense on the body (though still definitely harmful!). When we look for 5G on these lists, we are mainly looking for “high band”, GHz spectrum 5G.

Here is one more example of an antenna result we wanted to show you, because what it indicates is especially interesting, so take special note when you see one like this!

This image shows only the very end of a list of individual antennas contained in ONE antenna array! It contains 160 different antennas on the array, all within the 18 GHz range, each one being sometimes only a few megahertz apart! This is a perfect example of Massive MIMO, which is a unique 5G feature. It allows up to 256 individual antennas on one small array, each sending out individual pulses as soon as any 5G device in the vicinity puts out a request. None of them interfere with each other, because they all use slightly different frequencies. Multiple antennas can respond to each user request, depending on the size of the information packet the device is demanding, making sure that the information is transmitted as quickly as possible with the least possible interference and lag.

It’s apparent that being in the physical vicinity of an antenna array like this could be quite intense on thehat is a TON of invisible information that your body is having to process. If you are within close range of an antenna structure like this, our Premium home devices and the U1 Portable could be a good choice for you.

To read more about how 5G works, including Massive MIMO, be sure to read our recent 5G Explained article!

A Few Final Notes of Importance

When you’re viewing antenna results and looking specifically for 5G antennas, pay special attention to any antennas that are less than a quarter of a mile from your address (0.25 miles), and especially within 0.1 miles. Less than 0.1 miles could be considered “close range” or “line of sight”, depending on the visibility/obstructions in your immediate environment. Since 5G frequencies don’t reach very far, it’s likely that the ones further away won’t affect you very much (if at all), but the close range ones could potentially affect you a lot.

Also, occasionally the Antenna Search database will not be able to locate your address. If this happens, our recommendation is to try another address that’s as close as possible to the original address (use an online maps database to find nearby addresses), such as down the street from you, especially if the address is of a nearby business. If it works, it’s close enough to the intended address where the results will still be relevant.

If the search engine can’t find your address, it may also give you the option of searching results for your city/town in general, or your zip code in general. This will be less specific, but could be good enough if nothing else works.

Overall, this is a really helpful and enlightening tool for you to find out your level of EMF saturation from wireless cell phone tower sources, and the right Blushield device for your living situation and needs.

EMF Spectrum Cheat Sheet