Blog & Articles

Throughout the history of discoveries of mathematical concepts with elements of universal truth, a few concepts stand out on their own, as if they were keys to open to us a glimpse into the complex structure of the universe itself. One of these that has demonstrated over time to be applicable to nearly every aspect of life and the universe, is the Phi ratio.

Called by a variety of names, Phi is also referred to as the Golden ratio, Golden mean, Golden number, Golden section, and the Divine Proportion (by Renaissance artists), among others. It’s also intimately related to the Fibonacci sequence (or Fibonacci series).

The number itself is 1.618033988749895… commonly shortened to 1.618. The “...” indicated in the longer version means it goes on infinitely, as far as we know.

Why is this number so “golden” in the minds of centuries of great thinkers? It’s an irrational number, which means it can’t be reduced to a fraction of integers, and it essentially goes on forever (after the decimal place) with no discernible pattern. So what is the significance of such a seemingly chaotic number?

To get a basic visual of Phi, imagine a line of a certain length, any length. Now, you could divide this line into two lines at any point. But there is one specific point, which is around 0.618 of the whole (1) line, where if you divide it, the ratio of the larger segment to the smaller segment is the same as the ratio of the whole original line to the larger segment – 1.618 to 1. There is only one place you can divide the line where this is possible. See illustration below for a visual understanding:

There are many other methods to derive and demonstrate Phi with mathematics and geometry. You can use the Fibonacci sequence, a numerical series made widely known by Leonardo Fibonacci in the year 1202 AD (although the series was known by Indian mathematicians since the 6^th century AD). The series starts as 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377… and keeps going indefinitely. Each number is the sum of the two numbers preceding it. The higher the numbers go, the more exactly the ratios between each adjacent number approximate Phi.

Phi has many unusual mathematical properties, and is the solution to a quadratic equation. Even more profoundly, it is pervasive throughout nature: it is found in the forms of the bodies of animals, humans, shells, insects, trees, leaves, flowers, and even the solar system and human DNA!

Phi ratio in nature and human behavior

The Phi ratio is found all throughout the proportions of the human form. It is found in the proportion of human facial features, and faces that most closely approximate the Phi ratio are closest to what is considered most aesthetically beautiful. It’s also found in the proportions of the sections of the human body (head, torso, legs), fingers, and teeth. Since Phi seems to be a foundational element of the human design and beauty standard, it isn’t surprising that Phi is used in facial plastic surgery and cosmetic dentistry!

The petals and spiral patterns of flowers are a complex natural expression of Phi, as well as the patterns of leaf veins, honeycombs, insect body sections, wing dimensions and spots on moths and butterflies, the spirals of seashells, and even a wide variety of differently shaped animal bodies are found to be different configurations of Phi!

The double helix spiral of human DNA embodies Phi proportions, as well as the spirals of galaxies themselves. This ratio seems to be so pervasive in nature that it inhabits the microcosm of DNA, all the way to the macrocosm of galaxies!

As we ourselves are interconnected with nature, and are ourselves natural beings, it makes sense that much of human behavior tends instinctively towards Phi. It has been found that population growth can be recorded and predicted using Phi, and even the rises and falls of the stock market! Since stock market changes are determined by human expectations, and human expectations have been found to occur in a ratio near Phi, Phi has been used with great success to analyze and predict stock market moves. Because humans unconsciously express Phi in their behavior, like other animals, it has been said that the stock market may have geometrically as perfect a pattern as a spider’s web!

Human-created art and architecture, especially what are considered the “great works” throughout history, contain design elements utilizing Phi. This includes the Great Pyramid of Egypt, the Parthenon (apparently the Greeks were consciously aware of Phi during its design), a number of paintings by Leonardo Da Vinci, Raphael, Botticelli, Georges Seurat, and more. The long-revered Stradivarius violins built in the 1700’s show Phi relationships. Modern architectural applications include the Notre Dame in France, and several other modern buildings. Phi is used in the design of logos by many major corporations, and in modern fashion. It is even being used to integrate knowledge in the fields of time and quantum physics!

It is notably found in the structure of great musical works. The peak, or capitulation, of great classical music pieces occurred very close to 61.8% of the way through each movement. This also occurs in popular music. Notes of a scale, chords, and octaves correlate to Fibonacci numbers.

Phi is seen pervasively in the visible patterns of nature, but just as with great music, it is also found in the frequencies and sounds of nature.

Phi and Blushield

It is clear that humans have an affinity for Phi, as it seems to be weaved into our very structure! Although humans have a tendency to create beautiful works of art, architecture and music by subconsciously utilizing Phi, not everything humans have created is even close to Phi. Some of our creations are very, very far from it.

Manmade electromagnetic fields, if we were able to see and hear them, would not appeal to our sense of aesthetics at all. They are static, infinitely repeating frequencies. If they were audible to us, they would drive us crazy. They might sound like a loud car alarm that never turns off, an alarm clock, or high-pitched screeching. These types of frequencies are not compatible with our bodies. Our bodies like the frequencies of nature, which express the complexities of Phi and other natural patterns.

This is why Blushield utilizes the Phi ratio as a foundational aspect of the infinitely varied, multiple waveform output of its microprocessors.

As 5G is on the verge of being rolled out all over the world, Blushield has prepared for this increasingly harmful and abrasive element by developing a new version of the Ultra unit: the Premium Ultra. The Ultra, itself, is already the most powerful Blushield model, in terms of strength and area of coverage. The Premium Ultra adds a new element, specifically designed to provide more protection to our cells from the added stress of 5G: constant emission of Phi ratio waveforms.

All other Blushield models emit a complex, ever-changing multiple waveform every 30 seconds, which is more than sufficient to entrain our bodies to the Blushield and ignore the manmade EMFs. But since 5G is a stronger, higher frequency, with more pulsations, and will be more densely placed throughout cities and towns, it is appropriate to combat this with a constant emission of natural frequencies modeled after Phi.

References:

“Golden ratio properties, appearances and applications overview” – https://www.goldennumber.net/golden-ratio/

Over the past 30 years that Blushield technology has been in development, a number of different models have been designed and manufactured to meet the widely varying needs of people in different situations.

You’ve probably noticed there are several options for a stationary home model and several options for portables.  How do you know which Blushield models are right for your situation?

The most important thing to understand is the home units are the foundation of your protection.  Since they plug into the wall of your house and use mains power, they are able to broadcast a strong enough field to effectively compete against the EMF pollution affecting your home environment.  This strong field is required for your body to initially entrain to the Blushield frequencies via sympathetic resonance, and stop “attacking” the invisible threat of the EMFs, allowing your body to regain its health by reclaiming immune power for more productive uses.

The portable units are meant to be used as an adjunct to your home unit.  Because they run on battery power, they are not strong enough on their own to achieve strong sympathetic resonance initially, but they do have enough strength to maintain your entrainment to Blushield frequencies while you’re away from your house for periods of time, and prevent your body from resuming its unproductive attack on the harmful EMFs around you.

Our entry level Phi Series has one portable option and two options for home units, all with white ABS plastic cases.  These models are the upgrade and redesign of our previous Tesla/Home Series Plugin, Cube and Portable.  The redesign brings nicer, more aesthetic case designs, and most importantly, the implementation of the dual band multiple waveform algorithm that was previously only present in our Ultimate Series, for optimal protection from intense EMF sources like close range 5G!  The Phi Series has lower protection levels overall, and a lower price tag.  These units are ideal for rural and suburban areas and small towns with low to moderate EMF levels.

Our Ultimate Series includes one portable option and three home units.  They have a stronger level of protection than the Phi Series, and are ideal for use in areas with moderate, high or extreme levels of EMFs.  The case materials are heavier and more durable with richer colors, for the ultimate aesthetic you'll want to show off to all your friends!

Our Sensitive Series is just beginning, and currently consists of one portable device.  This series is designed to bring a calmer, more soothing field into the lives of those who are electro hypersensitive, or prone to high stress in general.

Our EVO Series currently consists of two home units and one portable unit, and is in a league of its own. It builds on the high quality materials and aesthetic of the Ultimate Series, with a considerably stronger protective field than our other models, and a completely new Phi-based frequency algorithm that's optimized for sleep support and mental agility.

Home Units

In order of the strength and protection level of each device, lowest to highest, the home units are the Phi Φ2 Plugin, Phi Φ3, B1 Premium Cube, C1 Ultimate Cube, EVO Cube and EVO Pyramid.  To determine which one will suit you best, think about how much EMF exposure reaches you while in your house.  Consider every source of electricity, but place extra emphasis on any cell towers or antennas within a 3 mile radius from your home (go to the Antenna Search website to type in your address and find this out), the number of Wifi signals you can pick up, and if you and/or your neighbors have Smart meters installed by the house.  Also factor in any extra wireless signals coming from appliances and devices in your home such as wireless doorbells, baby monitors, interactive “Smart speakers” like Amazon Echo or Alexa, other Smart devices, etc.

The more EMF saturation in and near your house, the stronger the Blushield model you will require to negate it.  We find that generally the number of cell towers within a few miles of your house indicates how EMF saturated of an environment you live in, and therefore the level of protection you need.  Less than 15 cell towers (and 50 or so antennas) within 3 miles, and the Phi Φ2 Plugin model will likely be sufficient for your needs, unless your house is packed full of Smart devices (which we recommend getting rid of anyway!). The coverage radius of the Phi Φ2 is 45 meters (around 147 feet) in every direction.

If you have more than 15 (and up to 80) cell towers near you, and 50-200 antennas, the Phi Φ3 is a better choice for you.  It is twice as strong as the Phi Φ2, and the radius of coverage is twice as large (90 meters, or 295 feet, in all directions).  If you are in a more rural environment with less than 15 cell towers, but know that your area is moving towards urbanization and the population increasing, you can count on an increase of EMFs around you from all sources in the future.  If that’s the case for you, you may plan in advance and get a Phi Φ3 instead of a Phi Φ2, even if a Phi Φ2 is sufficient for your current needs. Blushield home devices can last many, many years, so viewing them as an investment in your future protection is wise!  The Phi Φ2 and Phi Φ3 are both made of white ABS plastic, which is a highly durable yet lightweight plastic (the same type that legos are made from!)

Our B1 Premium Cube has a somewhat stronger protective field than the Phi Φ3, with a premium case made of blue and silver carbon alloy. Its coverage radius is the same as the Phi Φ3, 90 meters (295 feet) in all directions from where the device is plugged in.  The other difference between the B1 and Phi Φ3 is the aesthetics and materials, with the B1 being a heavier and more robust device. We recommend this model for areas with between 80 and 120 cell towers within 3 miles, and about 200-300 antennas.

Another step up in protection strength and coverage area is the C1 Ultimate Cube.  The C1 is designed for people living in densely populated areas or anyone who needs maximum coverage area, and has more than 120 to 450 cell towers and 300 to 1,000 or more antennas within 3 miles.  It provides more than twice the protective strength as the B1 Premium Cube, and 25% larger of a coverage area, reaching 120 meters (393 feet) in every direction from where it's plugged in.  The case is a highly durable aircraft grade gray alloy, with a unique geometric cube design.

Our strongest home models, which are in a league of their own, are the EVO Cube and EVO Pyramid.  These models feature a completely new Phi-based multiple waveform scalar algorithm that's been optimized for sleep support, relaxation and mental agility.  They are considerably stronger (more than 4 times) in protection strength than the C1, with a large coverage area of 120 meters (393 feet) in all directions from where they're plugged in.  For those with more than 400 cell towers within a 3 mile radius of their home, or anyone who wants the absolute strongest protection available, an EVO home device is a smart choice.

The difference between the EVO Cube and EVO Pyramid is mainly aesthetic, as they run the same frequency circuit.  However, since pyramid shapes are known to concentrate and amplify energy, the inventor theorizes that the EVO Pyramid is actually stronger than the EVO Cube.

The C1 Ultimate Cube and the EVOs are both great choices for those living in very EMF dense areas (especially if there are 8 or more 5G antennas nearby), in the middle of large cities and close to international airports, and also for anyone who wants to "future proof" their investment by making sure their Blushield is strong enough to protect them for many years to come, even if their EMF exposure increases considerably in the future.

Portable Units

There are 4 portable models available.  They function in similar ways, and are compact, lightweight devices that are powered by a rechargeable lithium ion battery.  They are designed to maintain your entrainment to the Blushield frequency field for shorter periods while you’re away from your stronger stationary home device, and therefore prevent your body from resuming its attack on the perceived threat of the harmful EMFs.

Our portable options are the Phi Φ1 Portable, Ultimate Portable, Sensitive Portable, and EVO Portable.

These rectangular portable units are ideal to carry in a secure pocket, or in a protected area of a purse or backpack.  You want to make sure your portable is protected from too many other things in your bag so it won’t accumulate dirt, which may affect the functioning and overall life of the device, and so the on/off button isn’t accidentally pressed by another item.  The portables are safe to bring on airplanes, and excellent for making your air travel experience more comfortable.  These devices are not waterproof, so be sure to keep yours dry.  If you will be sweating from working out, or may be out in the rain, it can be smart to keep your device in a plastic baggie to make sure it stays dry.  We also offer Blushield Portable Pouches that you can put your Portable unit into to protect it from damage if it's dropped, or from dirt building up in the charger port.

The portables produce a spherical protective field that's designed to protect one person, carried with you while out and about.  If others are in close proximity to you, such as within a few feet while in a vehicle or other location, they will be protected during that time, as well.  For family members who go places separately, or tend to wander further during outings together, then one portable for each family member will give you the best protection.

Here are the options for portables, and their similarities and differences.

The newest version of the Phi Φ1 Portable has an updated set of frequencies for even more protection than before, a black ABS plastic case, a 350 mAh battery and comes with a USB-C charging cable that can be charged in the same way as your cell phone, such as from your computer or from a USB adapter wall plug.  ABS is the same plastic that legos are made from, and is known for its strong resistance to corrosive chemicals and physical impacts.  The battery life between charges is about 2 days of continuous use (much longer if you turn the device off when you're not using it), and only takes a couple hours to recharge fully.

The Phi Φ1 is our Phi Series portable option, good for travel in low to moderate EMF areas.  If you live or travel in moderately high to extreme EMF areas, you will want to check out one of our stronger portable models, described below!

Our brand new Ultimate Portable brings back our classic, old school case design, with a powerful 1000 mAH battery and a completely new multiple waveform algorithm.  This is the portable partner to the C1 Ultimate Cube, and is designed for travel in high to extreme EMF areas.  The lithium ion battery lasts several continuous days on one charge, and can be recharged using a USB-C charger cord of any strength (fast chargers are okay!).  It takes around 3 hours on a fast charger to recharge fully.

Our Sensitive Portable launches a brand new line, designed specifically for electro hypersensitive (EHS) people, or those who feel stressed easily, who need a calming field for a grounding, soothing effect.  This portable model is also very powerful, designed for moderate to high EMF areas, and is best combined with the B1 Premium Cube or U2 Premium Ultra.  It also contains a 1000 mAH battery, which lasts several continuous days per charge, and takes around 3 hours on a fast charger to recharge fully.

Finally, the EVO Portable is your on-the-go adjunct to our EVO Cube and EVO Pyramid!  It runs the same Phi ratio focused circuit as the EVO home models, in a portable package.  This is the strongest of our portable models, but also emits a very smooth signal similar to the EVO home models, designed to optimize sleep quality and mental function.  It has a heavy duty 2000 mAH battery, will last several continuous days per charge, and takes around 3 hours on a USB-C fast charger to recharge fully.

Since each of these portables are unique in the structure and pattern of their protective scalar field, they will each have a slightly different "feel".  You can collect multiple portables to feel the differences for yourself, and pick the one that calls to you each day!

Auto Unit

We used to carry a device specifically designed for use in cars, which plugged into the 12 volt cigarette lighter.  This model was one of our older mono band devices, and is no longer being produced.  Our suggested upgrade to this older model would be to get a Phi 03 home device, and instead of using the AC plug it comes with (that plugs into a standard wall socket), you can get a low cost adapter cord for use in your car, on the Accessories page of our website (choose the "Auto Adapter Cord" option).

The Phi 03 running in your car will emit a very large protective field with a base protection strength that is twice as strong as the older Auto unit, and also emits our upgraded dual band signal for better protection from close range and wide band 5G.

This is a good choice for anyone who spends a lot of time in their car, such as truck drivers and anyone who commutes long distances, drives their car for work, or takes frequent long road trips. It is strong enough to act as a "home unit in your car", to maintain resonance with the Blushield field for long periods of continuous road time.

Conclusion

The best long term strategy is to have a home unit and a portable unit.  If your budget only allows you to get one at first, a home unit is definitely ideal, to establish sympathetic resonance and be protected in the place you spend most of your time.  Then later on, you can add a portable to increase protection.

If you have any additional questions on the different devices, you are welcome to contact us anytime.  We are happy to help!

The chronic, pervasive levels of electromagnetic radiation we are exposed to in modern environments has a significant negative impact on our long term health. The structure, frequency range, and repetitive style of these EMFs is very unlike the natural environments that our bodies have evolved within. Similar to wild animals whose instincts can’t properly instruct them on how to respond to the threat of cars on major highways (a sudden, modern threat they haven’t evolved with), our body’s DNA does not understand the nature or function of the EMFs it perceives, or what to do about it.

So our body’s response is to attack the perceived foreign invader, ramping up our immune system to destroy it, just like it would respond to an invading virus or bacteria. The problem is, there is nothing physical to attack and destroy. Our immune system cannot destroy these unnatural frequencies in our environment, so the result is that it keeps trying every day, day and night, for the duration of our time in the EMF rich environment (which for most of us is constant and perpetual). This has the unfortunate effect of eventually exhausting our immune system, as it’s engaged in a futile battle it cannot win. With an exhausted immune system, our defenses are down, and we are unable to effectively fight off actual viruses and bacteria, or maintain optimal health.

Blushield works by using its powerful microprocessor to compete with the manmade EMFs, saturating our environment with natural, harmonious, biologically coherent fields. Since its strength matches or exceeds the strength of the EMFs, the Blushield is “loud” enough for our bodies to “hear” over the unnatural EMFs. Since Blushield waveforms are designed to mimic the ever-varying harmonious frequencies emitted by nature, our bodies understand and recognize them. They will begin to attune to, resonate with, these natural fields, and begin to literally ignore (stop attacking) the harmful EMFs which causes the elevated white blood cell counts, inflammation markers, etc. This process is called sympathetic resonance.

The bodily entrainment process of sympathetic resonance begins as soon as you first plug in your home Blushield device. There is an adaptation period of usually up to 14 days, and as your body feels relaxed and calmed by these new natural frequencies, it stops attempting to attack the harmful EMFs, and begins to reclaim its own immune power. It can take time for the body to regenerate from such a long period of biological stress generated by the constant bombardment of harmful EMFs.

As the body reclaims its immune power and health begins to improve, it’s possible that some people will experience some detox symptoms, as toxins that were stored up over time begin to be released and eliminated. This detox could be completely unnoticeable, especially in people who are generally healthy with a strong constitution, but some people may notice detox effects for some amount of time, that resolve as the body adapts, eventually resulting in a consistently better state of overall health.

Detox is actually a good thing, and something we should consider as part of a healthy lifestyle. Doing regular herbal/nutritional cleanses, fasting, and utilizing substances that draw out toxins in the body is paramount to aging well and improving conscious awareness and feelings of well-being.

Often, when people first experience our devices, they are surprised that our technology has biological effects such as a detox reaction and often (if they have never cleansed in their entire life) feel very low energy and uncomfortable as the body starts to reallocate immune power back to the body to "clean house" and rebalance the bodily systems to their natural state.

Below, we cover some of the options we are now offering on our website that will help support this transitory detox period, to alleviate and expedite the potential detox symptoms one could possibly experience in the first 14 days of incorporating Blushield EMF protection.

These options are not only good for the initial stages of introducing Blushield technology into your environment, they are also great for ongoing health maintenance and longevity.

How to make EMF detox quicker & easier

There are a few powerful supplements that we have found significantly improve the speed and ease of the detox process. These are valuable to learn about and utilize as you are restoring your health from long term EMF stress.

Marine Plasma Minerals

Mineral supplements of various kinds are widely available, but they are not all of the same caliber. Most minerals are synthetically made, and not easily absorbed by the body. Even the more absorbable forms of single minerals still warrant a cautious approach, as our bodies thrive when each mineral is at an optimal ratio to other minerals, which is difficult to achieve using combinations of individual minerals. Even with the Marine plasma minerals, there are varying degrees of quality and as you might expect, we value quality over quantity and since we are not a supplement company, we expect nothing short of the best quality for you and your family.

Biocean Marine Plasma Minerals are on another level. These triple filtered, full spectrum raw ocean minerals are 100% natural, absorbable and bio-compatible with the human body. They are sourced from a special type of ocean water, then concentrated and filtered to create pure, potent mineral sustenance, with mineral ratios that are surprisingly similar to the levels in healthy human blood plasma.

These ultra pure ocean minerals support energy metabolism and enzymatic reactions, making the detox process faster and more efficient. They help restore health by promoting optimal hydration and acid-alkaline balance, assisting in the digestion and utilization of fats, carbohydrates and proteins, and maintaining the strength and integrity of bones, teeth and muscles. The ample magnesium levels this plasma contains are especially helpful in protecting the brain from the effects EMFs have of overstimulating the voltage-gated calcium channels in each of our cells. These VGCCs excrete 100 times more calcium when influenced by EMF than baseline, which as a byproduct, imbalances magnesium levels in the body.

To read more about Biocean Pure Marine Plasma, and to place your order, click here.

Systemic Enzymes

You’ve surely heard of supplemental digestive enzymes, but do you know about systemic, proteolytic enzymes? These types of enzymes are not designed for digesting food – they are made for deep level detoxification and cellular regeneration. What happens when you take a high quality systemic enzyme supplement on an empty stomach, is these protein-digesting enzymes go to work deep in your bloodstream and body to eat up areas of acute and chronic inflammation, fibrin deposits in calcified areas, internal and external scar tissue, debris in the sinuses and lungs, dental plaque, and even plaque in the brain that impairs your memory and brain function.

The results in the immediate and long term include reduced pain, noticeably reduced inflammation all throughout the body, more ease in breathing, infections clearing up, injuries healing faster, quicker recovery from intense physical activity, increased mental clarity and brain function, reduced dental plaque, improved function of the heart, veins and arteries, and much more. We like to think of these enzymes as a bunch of little scavengers that scour through the body and find every little bit of debris, and consume it entirely, leaving clean, regenerated, optimally functional tissue behind them!

The enzymes we recommend utilize serrapeptase and nattokinase, two of the proteolytic enzymes most well studied and established for their therapeutic benefits, along with several cofactors that increase effectiveness. The enzymes are enteric coated with a non-toxic thick cellulose capsule (no plastic byproducts), allowing them to bypass the stomach acid and go to work directly into the bloodstream.

These are especially helpful in combination with the Biocean Marine Plasma, described above, as minerals help to active enzymes to their fullest potential.

To read more about our Systemic Enzymes, and to place your order, click here.

Schizandra

This last one isn’t as much a supplement as it is a concentrate of a highly revered berry used since ancient times in traditional Chinese and Daoist herbal medicine. The power of schizandra berry, and the reason it’s one of the top herbs among thousands used in this ancient tradition, is mainly attributable to its potent and thorough liver detoxification abilities.

Schizandra is effective at both Phase 1 and Phase 2 liver detoxification, which is rare. There are many substances that act in Phase 1, but not Phase 2. Phase 1 liver detox is where a substance binds to a toxin, and the toxin is mobilized from deep inside the tissues, and released into the bloodstream. Phase 2 is the subsequent complete removal of the toxin from the bloodstream safety out of the body, through one of the organs of elimination. The problem with supplements, foods and herbs that act only through Phase 1, is because when these toxins are stirred up from their safely tucked away spots inside the tissues, and released into the blood, they will wreak havoc and cause harm if they are not then immediately removed from the body via Phase 2. If these toxins continue circulating in the bloodstream, this can cause extreme, uncomfortable and even dangerous detox reactions, and if there’s no way for them to leave the body, they could end up right back in the same tissues they started from! This is what many consider a “healing crisis”. There are easier, safer and more effective ways to detox!

Schizandra has been demonstrated to be effective in activating all of the Phase 1 and Phase 2 liver detoxification enzymes safely and efficiently. Because of this potent attribute, and its other beneficial effects, schizandra is considered a premium grade adaptogen in Chinese medicine for its ability to act as a tonic and strengthen all the organ systems in the body.

Because of its thorough and complete effect on detoxification, schizandra can be taken daily for years straight with only positive effects, awarding it the rare label of a “tonic” in the Chinese medicinal system. It will never throw your body into a healing crisis, but will gently cleanse your liver. Schizandra also increases intracellular glutathione, which is the body’s master antioxidant system.

We consider schizandra to be one of the most important herbs to take regularly in modern times, as we are exposed to thousands of chemicals throughout our lives, all of which have to be processed by our overworked livers. Schizandra can take a huge burden off our liver, other elimination organs, and our whole body. It can help us reclaim our health after long term EMF exposure, as we utilize a Blushield to return to a parasympathetic state of relaxation and healing.

To read more about Pure Schizandra, and to place your order, click here.

Conclusion

These are our top strategies for quickly and easily moving into a state of increased health and well being as we remove the stress of the EMF threat by entraining to Blushield’s natural fields. In addition to the supplements above, do your best to drink plenty of pure water, prioritize quality rest and sleep, spend time in nature, eat healthy whole foods, and surround yourself with people you love, immersed in activities you enjoy.

It is possible to thrive, and be healthy and happy, even with all the stresses and challenges around us in these times!

The National Toxicology Program (NTP) is a United States government agency that formed in 1978, as a combination of multiple agencies: the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Centers for Disease Control (CDC), and National Institutes of Health (NIH). The NTP operates within a subdivision of the NIH, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS).

The NTP, a legitimate government agency, performed the largest, longest study on cell phone radiation that has ever been done. This particular study was requested by the FDA for the NTP to carry out. The reason why the FDA wanted this study done was to assess, using animal studies, whether there is risk to humans from cell phone radiation. They wanted this information because the only safety guidelines that existed at that time were based only on thermal, or heating, damage to tissues from short term exposure (which is known as the SAR safety limit). Nothing had yet been established about long term risk, or the risk of any non-thermal aspects of cell phone radiation. To accomplish this in the study, they used levels of cell phone radiation that were too low to cause a heating effect on tissue.

Ronald Melnick, PhD, worked as a senior toxicologist and independent consultant for 28 years at the NTP. He led the design and interpretation of the NTP study on cell phone radiation. He retired before the study was completed, but participated in the peer review of the study in 2018.

In Dr. Melnick’s career, he led the design and interpretation of toxicity and mechanistic studies on environmental and occupational chemicals. He served on numerous scientific review boards and advisory panels, including for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), World Health Organization (WHO), and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). The IARC classified radio frequency radiation as a possible carcinogen in 2011. Dr. Melnick also spent one year working at the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, assessing health risks of environmental agents.

Timeline of study, and how they did it

The radiofrequency radiation cancer study was requested by the FDA way back in 1999. The NTP committed to sponsoring and moving forward with it in 2001, and submitted proposal requests for the experiments in 2003-2004. When their requests were approved, in 2005 they signed a contract with IITRI in Chicago to do the exposure testing.

The Illinois Institute of Technology Research Institute (IITRI) operates as an independent, non-profit preclinical contract research organization, and was founded in 1936. IITRI has a long history of providing safety and toxicology testing services to the U.S. Government, as well as sponsors from the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, consumer products, and chemical industries.

They have been performing carcinogenicity studies in rodent models for over 40 years, and have a standardized method that is considered optimal for scientific accuracy. They are a major preclinical contractor to the National Cancer Institute, and their scientists are considered leaders in carcinogenicity evaluation. Studies by IITRI scientists have resulted in over 200 published papers and book chapters on the subject of cancer alone.

The NTP cell phone radiation study came to be the largest cancer-related study that IITRI has performed yet. In 2007, exposure systems for the study, in this case reverberation chambers, were installed at IITRI, by Swiss company IT’IS. The use of reverberation chambers was carefully decided on, to correct inherent flaws in past studies that may have caused inaccuracies. The reverberation chambers served the purpose of exposing all the rodents to a uniform amount of radiation at all times, no matter where in the chamber they moved to, without having to confine them and potentially cause undue stress. Confining a rodent for the purpose of exposing them to a toxic element has always posed the problem of degrading their health due to the stress of being confined, therefore making it impossible to know how much the toxic element itself affected them.

They built 21 of these reverberation chambers, which are large, sealed rooms, for the different exposure groups and the control groups. Each chamber cost $100,000 to build. Then, to determine the non-thermal radiation exposure for the test, they calculated the amount of radiation they could be exposed to without raising their body temperature by 1 degree centigrade. They determined the levels and amount of exposure they should use on the rodents for the two-year study period (which is most of a rat’s natural lifetime) by calculating the differences between rodents and humans in size and lifespan, with the goal being for the rodents’ exposure to be translatable to an estimate of human radiofrequency radiation exposure over a human lifetime.

The exposure groups of rodents had an antenna emitting radiation in their room for about 9 hours daily, reverberating off the walls to create a homogeneous RF radiation environment, while the control groups were exposed to no radiation. A typical NTP toxicity study uses 50 rodents per group. For this study, they used 90 per group, to increase the accuracy of the results. Except for the radiation, the rodents were in a low-stress environment, and even had access to water from an automatic water system specially designed so the water itself wouldn’t absorb radiation.

The actual two-year exposure period happened during 2014 and 2015. The results were announced in 2016.

Unexpected findings

Before the conclusions of this study were known, various government agencies made some bold statements regarding their predictions. John Bucher, the NTP senior scientist who took over the lead of the study after Ronald Melnick retired in 2009, stated that he expected the results to show no association between RF radiation and cancer. The FDA, who requested the study in the first place, has expressed similar views. It’s very likely that this study was commissioned with the purpose of finally showing everyone how safe RF radiation is!

“Everyone expected this study to be negative,” said a senior government radiation official who asked to remain anonymous.

The findings surprised everyone. There were multiple negative effects in the exposure group, and none in the control group. One of the main findings was increased Schwannomas of the heart. Schwann cells are what creates the myelin sheath around the nerves, and in this case the nerves inside the heart. The other big finding was gliomas in the brain. Both of these types of cancers are very rare, but have also been found in humans in multiple epidemiological studies on RF radiation exposure. These tumors are extremely rare in rodent control groups, which increases the validity of these findings. Also, in larger numbers than the actual tumors that were found, were markers of precancerous states, as well as DNA damage in the brain. The male rodents fared much worse than the females, although the females also showed indicators of precancerous conditions and some DNA damage. All of the tumors were found in the males.

Ronald Melnick said that the NTP results provide “strong evidence for the genotoxicity of cell phone radiation,” and that “should put to rest the old argument that RF radiation cannot cause DNA damage.”

Peer review panel finds “clear evidence” of cancer

In 2018, two years after the results from the NTP study were released, a peer review panel was assembled to assess the study and determine its accuracy. The panel consisted of 11 pathologists and toxicologists from academia and industry. After a stringent assessment that is routine for the peer review process, they suggested 7 classification upgrades to the NTP’s own conclusions, which is an unprecedented amount. The panel concluded that the NTP downplayed the seriousness of the results in several areas.

Their conclusion: “Clear evidence of carcinogenic activity” in those male rats. The NTP uses 5 classifications to determine the level of carcinogenicity, and “clear evidence” is the strongest. In the NTP’s own conclusions, they determined RF radiation is a “probable carcinogen” (level 4 classification). They also found some evidence of tumors of the adrenal glands. The panelists unanimously praised the design and execution of the study.

Government agencies dismiss the study, and nothing has changed

So, the exceptional design and execution of this study, the elaborate time and money put into it, the fact that U.S. government agencies requested and performed it, and the very detailed and conclusive results mean that the FDA, the FCC and other regulatory bodies took immediate action and began to advise the public on how to take precautions to protect their health, and have also begun to invest research time into how to make cell phones and other RF radiation devices safer….. right?

No, that’s not what happened.

According to a report on the FDA’s website, “After reviewing the study, we disagree, however, with the conclusions of their final report regarding “clear evidence” of carcinogenic activity in rodents exposed to radiofrequency energy.”

So the FDA is “disagreeing” with a study that they commissioned, which made extensive use of taxpayer money supposedly for the cause of public health and safety, and that was thoroughly reviewed by actual scientists and experts on toxicology.

They claim that the NTP study used “extremely high levels” of RF radiation, which is not true. The study was specifically designed so the exposure levels were low enough to cause no heating effect whatsoever on the rodents’ bodies. The levels were also converted to be an accurate rodent equivalent to human exposure over an average human lifetime, while always staying under the dose that causes a heating effect. Either the FDA didn’t understand what they were reading, or they are intentionally lying to fool the general public with words and concepts that sound believable to someone who doesn’t actually know anything about how the study was conducted.

After an initial urgency of concern by the NTP about the clear evidence of cancer shown by the study, the NTP seems to have changed its position and now reflects the stance of the FDA, stating that “these findings should not be directly extrapolated to human cell phone usage.”

Another statement on the FDA website, “...but we must remember the study was not designed to test the safety of cell phone use in humans, so we cannot draw conclusions about the risks of cell phone use from it,” completely dismisses the established scientific method of using rodents to assess the dangers of potentially toxic elements in humans. This study was exactly intended to test the safety of cell phone use in humans.

“They wanted us to conduct animal studies in order to assess whether there is a risk to humans from cell phone radiation,” Dr. Ronald Melnick, the lead designer of the NTP study, states.

There are multiple reasons that animal studies are superior to human studies, even relating to effects on humans:

1) Every known human carcinogen is also a carcinogen in animal studies that have been properly conducted.

2) Animals have shorter lifespans, so the conclusions of a lifetime of exposure to a toxin can be determined many decades sooner, so that informed, protective actions can be taken.

3) With human studies, there are always other environmental factors in play, and even psychosomatic factors, which can considerably influence results. Animals can be quarantined in a controlled environment, and are not affected by psychosomatic factors, allowing for exacting results.

If an animal study this extensive and well-executed can’t be taken seriously, then what can?

References:

• Dr. Ronald Melnick interview: “Clear Evidence of Cancer: The $30M NTP Study” (behind paywall) – https://healthmeans.com/talk/2cd10170-f2d9-40fd-8870-85cec5ccc66b/f2ce6d04-ae83-4aaa-b6c7-425559e13f4f?currentTime=0
• Microwave News: “NTP Cancer Results” – https://microwavenews.com/news-center/ntp-cancer-results
• Microwave News: “NTP Peer Review Sees Tumor Risk” – https://microwavenews.com/news-center/ntp-peer-review-sees-tumor-risk
• Microwave News: “NTP: Cell Phone RF Breaks DNA” – https://microwavenews.com/news-center/ntp-comet-assay
• IITRI: “Carcinogenicity Studies” – https://iitri.org/carcinogenicity-studies
• FDA website: “Statement from Jeffrey Shuren, M.D., director of the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health on the recent National Toxicology Program report on radiofrequency energy exposure” – https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/statement-jeffrey-shuren-md-jd-director-fdas-center-devices-and-radiological-health-recent-national

Independent testing on popular cell phones shows radiation exceeds government safety limits

Recently, on August 21^st, 2019, the Chicago Tribune revealed that in the past year, they hired a reputable, FCC-recognized lab to test 11 popular cell phones for radiofrequency radiation. They used the same tests that the cell phone companies themselves use to test their phones to gain FCC approval. The results of these independent tests will raise many eyebrows: several of the phones tested considerably higher than the government safety limits they claim to be compliant with.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is responsible for ensuring that all new phones to hit the market are thoroughly tested to ensure they will expose a cell phone user to less radiation than the federal safety limit. This safety limit is called the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR), and measures the amount of radiation absorbed by the body from a certain distance away (usually 5 to 15 millimeters), at the highest radiation output the phone would emit. The current safety limit, which was established over 20 years ago, is 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one gram of tissue. For a phone to be granted approval by the FCC to be sold on the market, they state that the device “will never exceed” this radiation safety limit.

RF Exposure Lab in San Marcos, California is an accredited testing lab recognized by the FCC. For 15 years, they have been conducting tests for wireless companies seeking FCC approval for new products. Lab owner Jay Moulton says that all of the tests they did for the Chicago Tribune were in accordance with FCC rules and guidelines. Moulton certainly did not expect the results he found.

On the initial tests, where the phone was placed the same distance from simulated bodily fluid as the manufacturer’s tests, 4 of the 11 phones tested well over the safety limits. Of special note is the Apple iPhone 7, one of the most popular cell phones ever sold. It tested considerably over the safety limit, and at about twice the level as Apple advertises. Even more telling is the results of the second test the lab did, at an even closer distance (2 millimeters) that mimics the distance of the phone from the body when carried in a pocket, which most people do these days. This closer proximity test raised the radiation exposure of most of the phones to 2-5 times above the safety limit!

How were the tests performed?

The Chicago Tribune-sponsored testing represents one of the most comprehensive independent investigations of its kind. Sam Roe, the investigative journalist involved in this project and the reporter of the findings, won a Pulitzer Prize in 2008 for superb investigative journalism, and was a Pulitzer finalist on four other occasions.

The phones tested included four Apple iPhone models, three Samsung Galaxy models, three Moto phones from Motorola and a Vivo from BLU, all purchased new for the sole purpose of the testing. Multiple iPhone 7’s were tested, because the initial results were so high that they wanted to double check, just in case the first one was a defective phone.

Before testing, Moulton reviewed the exact testing data and variables each company had used with their initial compliance tests, which is publicly available on the FCC website, and mimicked exactly the original test conditions for each phone model. This means which licensed band, frequency and channel was tested for each phone. Then, each phone was placed under a tub of specially formulated liquid designed to replicate human body tissue. A nearby base station simulator was used to place a call to the phone, then the settings were adjusted until the phone was operating at its full power. A robotic arm would then move the phone to different positions in the liquid, all within 5-15 millimeters from the surface (or 2 millimeters for the second test), and a probe would take 276 separate measurements of the liquid to determine the radiation absorbed, which then determined the SAR rate for that phone.

This is exactly how all new phone models are tested for approval by the FCC. “We’re not doing anything extraordinary or different here,” Moulton said. Any qualified lab "should be able to grab a phone off the shelf and test it to see if it meets requirements.”

Cell phone companies don't like the results

The 100-page laboratory report on the test results was sent to Apple, Samsung, Motorola, BLU, and the FCC. Apple disputed the findings, claiming the tests weren’t done in a way that could properly assess iPhones, but when asked, would not say exactly what was wrong with the methods, nor how they measure their own phones for RF radiation. Still, in response to their findings, the lab decided to retest the iPhones (including an additional one) with slightly altered conditions, with the intention of making sure that the phone’s built-in proximity sensors are activated, which supposedly reduce power while in contact with human tissue. For some reason, for most of the iPhones (including the iPhone 7), the SAR came back with even higher results from this modified test!

Apple then stated that they personally reviewed and validated all the phone models in the Tribune test, although they did not explain exactly what they meant by the term, “careful review and subsequent validation.”

The issue with the Samsung tests is that all of the compliance tests done were at 10-15mm from the body, a measurement distance that is within FCC test procedure guidelines, but further away than the exposure distance from the head and in the pocket by actual users. When measured at a closer distance that’s more realistic to common usage, their phone models far exceed the SAR safe level. Samsung would not comment on individual phone test results, and just stated that their devices sold in the United States “comply with FCC regulations.”

Motorola disputed the extra high results of their Moto e5 Play, stating that the tests must not have triggered the proximity sensor. This raised the question in Moulton’s mind that the Motorola sensors may not be consistent in their functioning, potentially exposing users to much higher levels of radiation, due to unpredictable sensor functioning. Motorola states that since their power management techniques are highly confidential, the Tribune’s independent lab did not have access to the right information to produce accurate results on their phones.

However, rules set by the FCC require that radiofrequency radiation testing be done “in a manner that permits independent assessment.” Withholding information that could affect independent test results is not allowed.

Motorola followed up later, saying it retested its phones at a lab of its choosing, and they were found to be within appropriate limits. When asked, they declined to share how they test their phones, and would not share their lab reports.

The FCC could barely be bothered to comment on the test results, simply saying they would examine some of the phone models in the investigation.

What's wrong with current government radiation standards

The current FCC regulations for the SAR rate were established in 1996, and have not been modified since, even in the face of new cell phone technology and new ways that people use their cell phones. The maximum distance that a phone could be tested at to achieve compliance was up to 25 millimeters, which is much further from the body than where today’s phone users keep their phones. The 25mm distance was set because in the ‘90s, people often carried their flip phones on belt clips, which were about an inch away from their body. No one uses belt clips anymore, and most often, the phone is carried in a regular pocket, which is generally only 2mm away from body tissue. Guidelines have not been updated to reflect changing habits of users, nor have users been adequately warned of the potential harm of keeping their phone that close.

In 2012, the Government Accountability Office (Congress’ research arm) suggested that the FCC reassess exposure limits and testing requirements, because the phones weren’t measured while against the body. The FCC took seven years to come to its conclusion, which is that the current safety limits are still adequate and no change is necessary.

Another concern with the current regulations is that they do not factor in vulnerable populations: children, teenagers and pregnant women. According to a 2019 report, 29% of U.S. teens sleep with their cell phone in bed with them. The SAR safety limit was set with a very large man’s head and body as the basis (they used Army personnel). Children have smaller heads and thinner skulls, and the developing brain is highly vulnerable to non-ionizing radiation, which many studies have demonstrated by now.

There is also no consideration for long-term exposure. Regulations are set based on immediate effects, with no thought for the many decades of consistent cell phone and other non-ionizing radiation exposure that most modern people, especially young people, will experience in their lifetimes.

Lastly and most importantly, the SAR safety standards are based on the (proven erroneous) assumption that the thermal effect that phones have, which is what the SAR tests measure, is the only way that cell phones can cause harm. There are several other proven mechanisms by which radiofrequency radiation causes more harm than from the thermal effect alone.

How can we protect ourselves?

It is clear that cell phone companies and the FCC don’t have our health and best interests in mind, so we are left to our own choices to protect ourselves. Most people are not going to give up their cell phones entirely, but there are things you can do to significantly reduce your exposure.

First of all, never carry your cell phone in your pocket (unless it’s set to airplane mode), never sleep with your cell phone near you (or on), and never hold your phone up to your head when you talk. It’s better to use speaker phone or an AirTube headset to make calls. Limit your children’s cell phone exposure, and be cautious during pregnancy and around babies.

To protect your body from any remaining radiation exposure (there will be some), use your phone in your home or office that’s equipped with a Blushield Plugin or Cube, in your car with the Blushield Auto, or at least carry your Portable model in your pocket whenever you are using your phone.

References:

Chicago Tribune: “We tested popular cellphones for radiofrequency radiation. Now the FCC is investigating.” – https://www.chicagotribune.com/investigations/ct-cell-phone-radiation-testing-20190821-72qgu4nzlfda5kyuhteiieh4da-story.html

Chicago Tribune: “Testing cellphones for radiofrequency radiation: how we did it” – https://www.chicagotribune.com/investigations/ct-cell-phone-radiation-testing-methodology--20190821-whddrljk6fbmxoqh25u5t7lkb4-story.html

Electromagnetic Radiation Safety: “What’s Wrong with Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits?” – https://www.saferemr.com/2017/09/whats-wrong-with-cell-phone-radiation.html

Bluetooth headsets are the current popular choice for listening to music, making hands-free phone calls, and any other digital communication that requires both speaking and listening, and their popularity has been increasing significantly over the past several years. The convenience of these wireless devices is irresistible to many; no wires to get in your way, and no need to talk directly into your phone when making calls.

Studies have suggested that the radiation you absorb from talking on your phone using a Bluetooth headset is less than talking with your phone right up to your head. But how accurate is this, and does this mean this popular technology is safe? If not, what alternatives do we have that can do the job as well as wireless headsets, but are safer choices for our health?

How Bluetooth works, and the flaws of the SAR rate

Bluetooth technology works by emitting wireless microwave radiation from a transmitter in the base device, to a receiver that sits right next to the headset or ear buds in your ears. Bluetooth headsets use short-range signals in the 2.4 Ghz band, the same spectrum as Wifi and microwave ovens. This is a higher frequency than the spectrum cell phones operate in.

Most Bluetooth wireless headsets are considered Class 2 Bluetooth devices, with a 2.5 mW output and a 20-30 foot range. However, be aware that some of the newer headsets on the market, such as the Apple AirPods and the Beats headphones, are being sold as Class 1 Bluetooth, boasting a far more powerful 300-foot transmission range. Class 1 devices operate at 100 mW, which is a 40 times stronger radiation output than previously popular headsets!

There is a widespread assumption by the telecom industry and researchers that since wireless technology, including Bluetooth, is considered non-thermal and non-ionizing radiation, that it is harmless. Therefore, industry safety standards focus entirely on keeping their devices under a certain level of thermal absorption effect on the body that someone stated as being safe around 20 years ago. This means how much it heats up tissue in its proximity. This standard is called the SAR (Specific Absorption Rate).

Not only are the thermal effects not even close to the most dangerous aspect of wireless radiation, but many independent researchers believe that the SAR rate is still set way too high to protect health! A lot of people can tangibly feel the thermal effect of their cell phones when they talk on their phone with it next to their heads. Many people will feel an obvious heating effect, and it’s not uncommon to get a headache on the side of your head the phone is held up to, which goes away shortly after moving the phone away – or even more telling, the headache switches sides when you switch your phone to the other side of your head!

Long term, chronic exposure so close to the brain

The industry claims that the radiation output of Bluetooth is too low to harm health. However, weak electromagnetic fields have been shown to be detrimental to health, especially when the exposure is long-term and constant, and in very close proximity to a vital organ. This is exactly how Bluetooth headsets are used. No one buys a headset so they can use it only occasionally, or for brief periods. More likely, they use it daily, sometimes for long periods of time.

This chronic use, and the location of the signal receivers being as close as physically possible to the inner ear and brain, is asking for trouble. The telecom industry states that the body only absorbs a fraction of the radiation from Bluetooth earbuds than what a cell phone emits, but Dr. Joel Moskowitz states that in actuality, because of the much closer proximity to the inside of the head, Bluetooth can affect the head specifically at a third to half of the level of a cell phone! Not as safe as we’ve been led to believe.

So close proximity combined with the more chronic levels of exposure, as people tend to use their headsets considerably more often than holding the phone up to their head (especially while listening to music), and the dangers of radiation exposure using wireless headsets very likely surpass the dangers of using your cell phone.

This becomes even worse if your phone is anywhere against your body while you’re using Bluetooth (or any headset), like in your pocket. When your phone is actively transmitting information to a headset, wireless or not, it emits far more radiation than when it’s not being used.

As reported in Renal and Urology News in 2009, a study done by the Reproductive Research Department of the Cleveland Clinic showed that a cell phone in the pocket of a male, in talk mode and transmitting to a Bluetooth headset, caused significantly reduced motility and viability of the sperm exposed to the radiation, and an increase in free radicals. In recent years, more than a dozen studies have been published by other groups that support the Cleveland Clinic’s findings.

Are wired headsets better?

The answer is yes, and no. The problem with wired headsets is that the wires act like an antenna, amplifying the radiation from your phone right into your head. Additionally, wired headsets emit their own radiation, independently from your phone.

Using the speaker phone option on your phone when you make a call, when possible, is a safer approach than either Bluetooth or wired headsets. Also, if you’re using any headset, make absolutely sure that your phone isn’t held anywhere against your body, such as in your pocket.

A completely safe option for hands-free cell phone use

We have established that wireless and wired headsets are both risky choices for your health. What degree of risk there is remains to be established, but we think you are much better off playing it safe, rather than making yourself the test subject! Head exposure to radiation has been linked with cancer, autism, brain tumors, premature hearing loss, hair loss, and a weakening of the blood-brain barrier.

Widely held concern over the radiation exposure of headsets has resulted in a technological innovation called the AirTube headset. With excellent sound quality and an attractive appearance, AirTube headsets reduce radiation exposure by 99.9% by utilizing a tube of air that converts the microwave signal to an acoustic waveform. These headsets can be found from multiple companies online. A simple search will yield quite a few options.

We understand that being attached to your device by a cord can be uncomfortable, or downright annoying. Opting to microwave your brain, risking all of these negative health outcomes, however - just to avoid a cord - is not a good trade off.

References:

EMF Portal: “Bluetooth” – https://www.emf-portal.org/en/emf-source/284

Renal and Urology News: “Cell Phone Use Could Damage Semen” – https://www.renalandurologynews.com/home/news/urology/reproductive-medicine/cell-phone-use-could-damage-semen/

What is scalar energy?

Scalar energy is considered, by the relatively few who know it exists, as one of the greatest discoveries in the history of science. Mostly referred to by the term "scalar fields" or "scalar energy", other terms used to describe this property of the universe are information fields, longitudinal magneto-dielectric waves, zero-point energy, tachyon, orgone, radiant energy, gravitic waves, quintessence, standing waves, and Tesla fields. The subject of scalar ties intimately into quantum mechanics and quantum field theory.

Scalar fields are thought to exist as the informational/non-physical component of all matter, but in this article we will be discussing them mainly in relation to electromagnetic fields (EMFs). Every EM wave has a component called the transverse wave, and another component called the longitudinal (scalar) wave.

Transverse waves are the part of the EMF that can be measured by meters, because they exist fully in 3-space (three-dimensional space) and are easily measurable. The term transverse refers to the up-and-down, oscillating motion of this wave moving through 3D space. They are also called Hertzian waves, and produce measurable frequencies. Transverse waves are what are currently being used in electricity and telecommunications, since they were more easily detectable and quantifiable to early scientists and electrical engineers.

The longitudinal (scalar) component of the EM wave does not exist normally in 3-space. Its movement is along the axis of time, the 4th dimension. This sounds mysterious and may be hard to understand without delving deeply into quantum mechanics, but time is considered to be simply compressed energy, compressed by the factor of the speed of light squared. Scalar waves are superluminal, which means they move faster than the speed of light, because they are largely unaffected by the limitations of 3D space. Also, since they don't exist in the third dimension in the same way that matter does, they move through the empty space between matter.

Although scalar fields cannot be detected by a standard meter, they are readily picked up by living organisms. All living things produce their own scalar energy (called bio-scalar), and are sensitive to scalar energy in their environment. The Earth is constantly producing a variety of ever-changing scalar fields, which our bodies have evolved with.

Since scalar fields can have more of an affinity for biology, they may affect the body more powerfully than the physical frequency (transverse) component.

Contrary to seemingly prevalent beliefs in the inherent goodness of scalar, scalar fields aren't good or bad. Their healing and constructive effects, or destructive effects, depends on how they are produced, exactly what information is being carried by the scalar component, and the coherent or incoherent fields that can be used for either harmonizing or destructive purposes.

The history of scalar energy in science and electromagnetics

The first time in recorded history that scalar was described was by Scottish scientist James Clerk Maxwell, in the mid 1800's. His first equations describing electric and magnetic fields also accounted for a scalar component. His linking of electricity and magnetism in his equations formed the basis of modern physics, and also presented the theoretical possibility of scalar energy. As Maxwell's electromagnetic concepts were further developed by early scientists (including Heinrich Hertz), the scalar theory was disregarded as "too mystical" and physically unmanifest, and therefore ineffectual. This couldn't be further from the truth, but it took half a century longer to begin to discover the true potential of scalar.

Nikola Tesla, a Serbian-American inventor, physicist, electrical engineer, and the inventor of radio and the alternating current (AC), accidentally rediscovered scalar waves while experimenting with violently abrupt direct current (DC) electrical charges. Tesla's experiments were building on German physicist Heinrich Hertz's proof of Maxwell's electromagnetic theories.

By 1904, Tesla had developed transmitters to move scalar energy back and forth while bypassing time and space with no need for wires, as it would simply materialize from one place to another. Unfortunately, he never received funding to continue his research to develop scalar technology enough to replace current forms of electricity. It is widely believed that Tesla never received funding because his discoveries were a threat to the profits of the huge energy industries of the time. Tesla had found a way to do what these industries were doing, but far better, faster, and with less expense to the consumer, because they didn't require the use of oil, coal or even wires.

The implications of continuing to develop scalar field theory and its practical applications could dramatically change the course of the world and society. Possibilities for the beneficial use of scalar energy include:

• clean, "free" energy technology to replace coal and oil fuel sources
• the ability to transmute elements, including radioactive waste into inert substance
• harnessing gravitic forces to create anti-gravity aircraft
• using scalar carrier waves to support physical healing from illness

Scalar isn't inherently good or bad

If you understand that scalar fields aren't inherently good or bad, you can develop a deeper understanding of the nuances of scalar. Every electromagnetic field has a scalar component, which is considered to carry the information each particular field is generating. Since scalar can have more of an affinity for biology, it may affect the body more powerfully than the physical frequency (transverse) component. Let's take the 60 Hz frequency generated by mains power, for example. This is the power your outlets, appliances and wires in your home generate. It is a steady, pulsed 60 Hz at all times, with no variance. When a living organism is exposed to one repetitive frequency for a long enough time, the scalar component of this single frequency will hit the body's cells in the same way, over and over, like a hammer banging on the same spot repeatedly. When one frequency hits the DNA of the cells in the same way over a long time, this may contribute to biological stress responses, altered cellular signaling, oxidative stress, or reduced regulatory resilience.

The measurable, transverse wave of the EMF is only one part of the problem. The scalar component of the EMF, the invisible counterpart that can't be picked up on a meter, is also an issue, and you can't block that. There are many products that are advertised to block EMFs, and therefore keep you safe. These products include Faraday cages, special types of metallic paint, pendants, pyramids, and more. Their tests to show you that it 'works' are simply using an EMF meter to show you that the device blocks or reduces the measurable frequency in a certain area. These studies focus on the wrong problem – the physical frequency itself. They don't take the scalar component into account at all. Nothing will block that, not even the thickest Faraday cage you can find. Therefore, you can't actually shield from EMF, because the scalar / informational component of the EMF still gets through. You can read more on why you can't block EMF here

The only studies that can prove that a device actually protects you from the harmful effects of EMFs would be solely focused on the results on living organisms – measuring changes in their health and vitality.

How Blushield uses a scalar carrier signal

The scalar carrier signal is a key component to the effectiveness of Blushield devices. The microprocessor in Blushield delivers a complex multiple waveform algorithm of frequencies on a scalar carrier signal, which are modeled after the known patterns of nature, including the Phi ratio and Fibonacci as well as complex mathematical equations that never stimulate the body with the same combination of frequencies twice. The frequencies are all within the human responsive range, which are frequency ranges that are shown to affect living organisms in beneficial ways. Within that range and conforming to the natural patterns, the algorithm ensures that the frequency combinations are never repetitive – they will never produce the same combination of frequencies at the same amplitude twice. This ensures that we can have our Blushield running for years, decades, or our entire lives, and never become resistant to the frequencies and lose the beneficial effects.

This scalar signal carrying a variety of natural, coherent frequencies does not actually block the EMFs in our environment. If it did, our phones and electrical appliances would cease to function. It simply produces a competing field that's high-powered enough for our bodies to "hear" over the incoherent EMFs, and harmonious and natural so our bodies will "tune in to that radio station", so to speak! The manmade EMFs can continue to run in the background, nothing changed, but all living organisms in the range of the Blushield will have adapted to "listen" to the Blushield frequencies instead of the other.

The old days of using high voltage and coils to produce scalar are over. Blushield has innovated what is possible in regards to scalar energy and how it positively effects living organisms.

Blushield is not a Faraday cage and does not claim to eliminate wireless signals. Instead, it is designed to introduce a coherent, biologically compatible field pattern into the local environment. The goal is not to block technology, but to give the body a stronger organizing reference in the presence of complex, irregular, and biologically unfamiliar electromagnetic noise.

Blushield studies have focused entirely on its effects on the health of living organisms – the only results that truly matter. It has shown profound beneficial results in human live blood cell and urine analysis, and significant improvement in health markers and behavior of animals (cows and chickens). You can read through the results of these studies on the website.

Conclusion

We believe that scalar energy science is something we will all be seeing much more of in the future, and it's a major key to the technological innovations of the future with a wide expanse of applications – especially in the realms of energy production, physical healing, environmental cleanup, and air travel. For decades now, books, movies and other media have been portraying futuristic technological abilities as an inevitable progression for mankind, and the evidence of scalar playing a big part in this advancement is strong!

We are in a time period currently where most technology is not compatible with the health of living organisms on this planet. This is unsustainable, especially as technology becomes more prevalent and takes up ever increasing space in people's lives. We need to be thinking about how to merge technological innovations with the health of our bodies and minds. If we don't, our technology will eventually end up being our downfall.

We use Blushield as a link to this imagined sustainable future, to protect our health and ride through this present time where chronic illness is increasing at alarming rates, much of it seeming to be linked to harmful EMFs. We feel optimistic about humanity's future enlightenment towards sustainable living, and are choosing to keep ourselves as healthy and vital as possible during the often rough road to this future.

If you want to take a deeper dive into scalar, and learn more about this fascinating phenomenon, please read our Part 2 article:

Scalar Energy, Biology, and Consciousness

One modern trend in child raising is the use of baby monitors to ensure the well-being of babies overnight and during nap times. Parents are constantly bombarded with information on sleep safety, SIDS, and newborn breathing issues, so naturally, they want to do everything they can to keep their baby safe. Unfortunately, most baby monitors produce continuous, high levels of microwave radiation, directly targeting your baby while they sleep, so the well-intentioned use of baby monitors can cause more harm than good.

Let’s go into the unique dangers of EMFs (especially microwave frequencies) to babies and young children, touch on modern baby monitor options and their risks, and then address what we can do to keep our babies safe.

“There is no safety level for microwave radiation for children” – Barrie Trower

Barrie Trower is a former Royal Navy microwave radiation expert who received some of the world’s best training on microwaves. He worked with microwave warfare, bomb disposal and radar, so he knows firsthand the dangers of microwave radiation, which he says were used to create “sophisticated stealth weapons.”

These days, he does lectures specifically warning of the dangerous effects of these EMFs on babies, children and women. Children have less developed immune systems than adults, and depression of the immune system is the first thing that happens with EMF exposure. Also, because they are growing, the bones of babies and children are still soft, so the EMFs more readily penetrate into their bone marrow and all their stem cells that are vital to maturation. Their skulls are thinner and softer, allowing EMFs to penetrate deeper and more strongly into their brains. Skulls don’t completely harden until age 20, so this is still a problem through the teen years. Children also have less body mass, so will absorb a higher ratio of radiation to body mass than adults.

Embryos, fetuses, infants, children, and women (because of their complex, sensitive hormonal systems), in that order, are most significantly harmed by EMFs. After that, the elderly. Healthy young men are the least affected by EMFs.

“DNA damage [to the eggs in ovaries] caused by microwave radiation is irreparable. It is passed on from mother to daughter, generation after generation, forever.” – Barrie Trower

The risk is especially high for female children, due to the fact that they are born with all of the eggs they will ever have, already formed in their ovaries. EMFs damage these sensitive eggs, increasing the risk of DNA mutations and birth defects in their future children and grandchildren. The more consecutive years a girl is exposed to EMFs, the higher the risk of damage to her eggs. Damage to eggs cannot be repaired once it has occurred.

Baby monitors - a threat to your child's future

The most common baby monitors used today are wireless monitors with video cameras using DECT (Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications) technology. These expose your baby (and you, if you’re carrying the receiver) to very high levels of EMFs. Some of them, like the Owlet, even attach the transmitters directly to the baby! Devices like this not only expose babies to high levels of close range radiation, but they have high incidences of false alerts due to the natural, irregular breathing patterns of infants.

The American Academy of Pediatrics cautions against using wearable monitors. Yet parents continue to use these dangerous devices due to perceived convenience and what they’ve been convinced is the safer option, completely unaware of the harm they’re inadvertently causing to their child’s health.

Oram Miller, a building biologist who uses a radio frequency detector to test EMF levels throughout the homes of clients and advises them of options for improving the health of their homes, has found that wireless baby monitors produce microwave radiation twice as powerful as WiFi routers, and five times more powerful than a wireless tablet. Often, the highest EMF levels in an entire house are located in the baby’s nursery.

The FCC doesn’t think this is a cause for concern, as it is well below their arbitrary safety limits, limits for which no studies exist to prove the safety of. It is significant to note that the FCC limits in the United States are tens, to hundreds, and even thousands of times higher than most other countries (of recommended microwatts per square meter). These monitors would likely be illegal in many countries.

Oram Miller reports that in the United States, increasing numbers of people are complaining of symptoms that have been linked in scientific studies to EMF exposure, including headaches, ringing in the ears, numbness, tingling, difficulty learning, and memory loss.

Smart diapers - because your baby isn't irradiated enough

As if babies aren’t exposed to unprecedented high levels of EMFs already, some geniuses at big diaper corporations are trying to convince parents to buy their newest invention – the SMART diaper. In the race to digitize every aspect of normal human life, many people are now being duped into placing a Bluetooth sensor that emits microwave radiation 24/7 right next to their baby’s reproductive organs. This is pure insanity. Of course, these companies say nothing about the potential dangers of constant exposure to EMFs to your tiny baby’s most sensitive parts.

They tout the benefits of this product by emphasizing that you will always know when your baby needs a diaper change. There’s another great way to know if your baby needs changing – you could try being near them frequently and actually listening to them. But maybe having that much physical interaction with your baby in this modern world, where parents are always busy with far more important things than their children, is too much to ask. Hopefully soon, we will have actual robots that can do those messy diaper changes in our place, so we are free to have even less interaction with those smelly little creatures.

I hope the sarcasm above comes through loud and clear. Babies need regular, loving physical interaction with their parents. It is vital to bonding, and for proper development of their brains and nervous systems. We are surrounded by increasing amounts of technology that is distracting us from the importance of family time, and that harms our children. Using SMART diapers is another step towards only interacting with our babies when it’s “totally necessary,” while exposing them to unnecessary and harmful radiation during the most developmentally sensitive time of their lives.

What can we do to stay safe?

“Reduce use, and increase distance.”– Oram Miller, building biologist

The good news is, there is a lot we can do to stay safe! If you find that your lifestyle necessitates the use of a baby monitor, you will be relieved to know there are several options that are safer. The best way is to use a wired monitor, instead of wireless. Baby monitors with wired options often use an ethernet cable, or if ethernet isn’t doable for you, they have optional AC adapters that plug into the wall and work through your electrical lines. The wired connection significantly reduces EMF output.

Due to increasing awareness of the dangers of EMFs for babies and children, safer options for baby monitors continue to be designed and produced. Some other products only transmit audio, which emits less EMFs than video plus audio monitors. Others have sensors that only transmit wireless frequencies when they detect movement or noise, reducing the EMF output time up to 90%.

Here are links to some of the current most popular low EMF baby monitor options:

• Bebcare Hear Audio Baby Monitor (audio only)
• Bebcare Motion - Smart Video Baby Monitor (video and audio option)
• TimeFlys Audio Baby Monitor (a lower cost option)

Another simple way to reduce EMF exposure is move the baby monitor further away from the baby. At least 10 feet away is recommended.

There is always the option of getting rid of your baby monitor entirely, or not using one in the first place! Co-sleeping (positioning your baby’s bed right next to your bed) or bed sharing during infancy is by far the safest way to closely monitor your baby during sleep. During daytime naps, you could wear your baby in a carrier while they sleep, which has the added benefit of regulating their heartbeat and breathing. When babies are in direct contact with the body of a caregiver, they entrain to our breathing and heart rates. If you need to relax by yourself, do work at home, or do chores, you could let your baby nap in the same room you plan on working in.

Conclusion

Whether you use a baby monitor or not, your baby will inevitably still be exposed to some EMFs in your house, potentially from cell phones, WiFi, smart meters, your in-home wiring, and even cell towers and power lines in your neighborhood. It’s good to reduce exposure as much as possible, but it’s impractical and often impossible to eliminate it completely. Taking into consideration how developmentally sensitive babies and children are to EMFs, another option for keeping your child safe is having a Blushield device in your house. Blushield takes significant stress off the immune system that the harmful EMFs are causing, and many people report it increases the quality of their sleep. Based on the study results on Blushield devices on humans and animals, overall health will improve at the cell level (go look at the human live blood cell analysis!), including mental health and an overall sense of well-being.

We encourage you to make the wisest, most informed decisions on this important topic. Your family’s health is worth it!

References:

WiFi in Schools: “Videos: Why Women and Children Are More Vulnerable” – https://wifiinschools.com/videos-why-women-and-children-are-more-vulnerable.html

EMF Portal: “Baby Monitor” – https://www.emf-portal.org/en/emf-source/392

Mama Natural: “The Best Baby Monitor (Plus 4 Ways To Reduce EMF Exposure)” – https://www.mamanatural.com/best-baby-monitor/

Video: “How Safe Is A Wireless Baby Monitor?” – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WONwXP5lvM

Cutting-edge science is making new discoveries about a class of pathogens called retroviruses. Dr. Judy Mikovits, Frank Rosetti and other research scientists have found that human endogenous retroviruses (HERV’s) have evolved within human (and human ancestor) DNA for as long as we have existed. Human endogenous retroviruses make up to 15% of the human genome itself, from birth and way before, passed down through our lineages. Another class of retroviruses, called exogenous retroviruses, are pathogens we are exposed to throughout life, that often also integrate into our DNA through unique processes.

However, in healthy cells, retroviruses lie dormant. It’s only when the body is exposed to unhealthy conditions that the retroviruses “wake up” and cause symptoms. For many people, these symptoms can become chronic and are often debilitating. It is believed by experts who have studied this topic that the modern epidemic of a variety of chronic illness with no known causes, aka “mystery illness”, is ultimately caused by the activation of the endogenous retroviruses that live in our DNA.

What does it take to “wake up” these retroviruses? Anything that causes stress to the body and depresses the immune system: nutritional stress and nutrient deficiencies, stressful life circumstances, injury, surgery, environmental pollution, vaccines, pesticides and herbicides (especially glyphosate) in our food, water and environment, heavy metals, parasite infections, being sick with a viral or bacterial illness for a long time (or frequently), exposure to things we’re allergic to, and electromagnetic pollution.

Retroviruses can be picked up through our environment (HIV is a common one), and will then make their way into our cells by using an enzyme called reverse transcriptase to synthesize DNA on an RNA template. Retroviruses possess only RNA, and this enzymatic process is necessary for them to replicate in the host cell.

The link between EMF’s and chronic illness, and even certain retroviruses themselves, has been established. Incoherent electromagnetic frequencies, especially when we are constantly exposed to a variety of sources of them, are unrecognizable to the body, and make the body believe it’s being attacked by an actual physical pathogen like a virus. So the immune system ramps up to try to fight off this invisible invader. However, since no viral material is actually present, it fights perpetually until the entire immune system has worn itself down. Now it no longer has the energy to fight off actual invaders – including the hidden pathogens that lie dormant in our cells, the retroviruses.

Cancer causing retroviruses

“Retroviral insertion can convert a proto-oncogene, integral to the control of cell division, into an oncogene, the agent responsible for transforming a healthy cell into a cancer cell.”

– Encyclopedia Britannica

Viral-induced cancers were first discovered in 1911, when American pathologist Peyton Rous isolated a virus that could cause malignant sarcomas (cancers of connective tissues) in chickens, which he named the Rous sarcoma virus (RSV). At the time, he was unable to find viruses in other cancers, so temporarily abandoned his work. Decades later, the significance of his work finally got the attention it deserved, and more than 55 years after his first experiment, Rous was awarded the Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine for discovering tumor-inducing viruses.

In 1970, virologists in both Japan and America, working independently, discovered an enzyme that could synthesize proviral DNA from the RNA genome of Rous sarcoma virus. The enzyme was named RNA-directed DNA polymerase, commonly called reverse transcriptase. With the discovery of this enzyme and its actions, also came the discovery of the unique class of viruses that were named retroviruses, which use reverse transcriptase as the key to their especially stubborn and chronic infectious activity.

Then in the 1980’s, the HTLV retroviruses were discovered and found to cause leukemia, which was formerly thought to be the result of a bacterial infection. Then, the retrovirus HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) was isolated and found to be the cause of AIDS.

Electromagnetic fields and viral-induced cancers

“Integration of retrovirus DNA into cell chromosomes results in cancer, but the proto-oncogenes do not become cancer-causing genes unless triggered by another event. Cancers caused by chemical or physical carcinogens in the environment probably often, if not invariably, are due to alterations in the sequences of proto-oncogenes that have converted them to oncogenes.”

– Encyclopedia Britannica

In 1997, a study concluded that exposure to a 50 Hz electromagnetic field (a very low frequency compared to current electronic devices) induced activation of the Epstein-Barr virus genome in latently infected human lymphoid cells. This is an example of a dormant virus being activated by electromagnetic fields, and starting to replicate purely from EMF exposure. The EMF exposure of almost everyone on a daily basis today is far higher than when this study was done. It is well established that the Epstein-Barr virus can cause some types of cancer (like stomach cancer), and more recent studies are beginning to link the virus to even more common cancers, such as breast and colon cancers.

Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt is a medical doctor and founder of the Klinghardt Academy, the American Academy of Neural Therapy, medical director of the Institute of Neurobiology, lead clinician at the Sophia Health Institute, and founder and chairman of the Institute for Neurobiology. He is also an expert on retroviruses and their effects on human health.

Dr. Klinghardt states:

“But in the last two years, we’re realizing that that’s still not the depth of the bucket. What’s at the bottom of the bucket is a group of viruses. They’re called human endogenous retroviruses. These are viruses that are embedded in our DNA. We come in with them. But they’re silenced. They’re silenced largely through two mechanisms. One is called methylation. And the other one is called acetylation.

And those mechanisms are destroyed by the exposure to Wi-Fi or the cumulative exposure to the electromagnetic fields. And so, what happens is that these viruses are now replicating in us.”

He goes on to explain how retroviral infections occur with a host of other pathogens on the side that are often more visible: Lyme bacteria, parasites, candida, herpes, mold mycotoxins. These other pathogens cause immune stress and assist in triggering the dormant retroviruses, ramping up into a full-blown infection. So often, when someone is diagnosed with Lyme’s disease, or having symptoms of chronic fatigue, candida overgrowth, mold illness, or parasite infections, the deeper source of the symptoms is from the replication and destructive effects of the retroviruses that are now activated.

In Dr. Klinghardt’s medical practice, they have had success in shifting retroviruses back into their dormant state by modulating the environment of the patient – mainly by controlling EMF exposure and reducing toxic elements in the air, food and water. Then, by taming the retroviruses, other issues such as Lyme, candida, herpes, and other myriad issues start to resolve as a result of dealing with the deeper problem.

He also brings up mental illness, pointing out that the leading diagnosis in the United States right now is chronic anxiety, and that while toxins such as glyphosate are definitely a considerable factor in this, the main driver of chronic anxiety is harmful EMF’s.

The studies have already been done

Financially speaking, the telecommunications industry is six times larger than all the combined pharmaceutical industry. That could certainly be an explanation for why federal agencies are acting relatively powerless when it comes to regulating new technology, and not demanding thorough testing before implementation.

Just three years ago, in 2016, a ten-year study was completed that showed significant increases in cancer in rats exposed to cell phone radiation. These results contradict the widely held assumption that EMF has no harmful effects simply because the mechanism of action wasn’t understood – the assumption was that because low levels of radio frequency radiation (under the SAR safety limits for cell phones) don’t cause a detectable tissue heating effect, which assumes that this heating effect is the only mechanism that could cause harm. This is certainly not the case.

The findings of the 2016 study show that as the intensity of the radiation increased, so did the incidence of cancer among the rats – a significant dose-response relationship. Of special importance are the types of tumors the rats developed: high rates of glioma (tumors in the glial cells in the brain) and malignant schwannoma of the heart. This coincides with at least four epidemiological studies that also link cell phone use to those types of cancers. None of the rats in the control group developed either of these cancers. It’s also important to note that gliomas are a particularly deadly type of cancer. Most people survive only 1 to 3 years after diagnosis.

Based on the conclusiveness and seriousness of this study, the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) began urging federal agencies to inform the public of these results. Initially, NTP senior managers stated that they believe these results should be publicized as soon as possible because of the high risk level. The FDA and FCC, the two agencies responsible for regulating exposure to radio frequency radiation, were alerted to the study results but did not state how they planned to proceed with this information. Then at the beginning of 2018, the NTP did an unexplained one-eighty and stated that “using a cell phone is not a high-risk situation.”

A peer-review panel of 11 pathologists and toxicologists from academia and industry reviewed the NTP’s draft reports of the 2016 study, and concluded that there is “clear evidence of carcinogenic activity” – “clear” being the strongest of 5 terms used to classify evidence of carcinogenicity.

Why the NTP is now dramatically downplaying the obvious and undisputed results of this study, is cause for much speculation.

Conclusion

Based on what is currently known about retroviruses, it’s safe to assume we all have them sleeping in our cells. Many of us have very awake, active retroviruses causing anything from subtle, annoying symptoms to a full havoc wreaking. As environmental toxicity and EMF exposure increases, we seem to be seeing more and more of these “undiagnosable” symptoms and chronic mystery illnesses.

The key to healing, and putting these retroviruses back to sleep, seems to be primarily reducing exposure to toxicity and chronic immune system stress, including incoherent electromagnetic fields. There are several foods, supplements and herbal formulas that doctors are successfully using to control retroviral expression, including fulvic acid, chlorella, certain herbs like lomatium and Chinese skullcap, and broccoli sprout extract.

Using a Blushield in your house, car and workplace will take a significant stress load off your immune system. It’s still good to reduce your EMF exposure as much as reasonably possible, but the Blushield restores the body’s immune function by producing biologically harmonious frequencies that override the harmful, incoherent frequencies. Your body stops trying to attack the electromagnetic invisible invaders, and instead “listens to” the coherent frequencies of Blushield, which it does recognize because Blushield frequencies mimic the frequency range of nature that we have evolved with.

Browse Blushield options here, to see how you can greatly assist the restoration of your immune function and make a big move in the prevention and treatment of chronic illness.

References:

Britannica: “Reverse transcriptase – enzyme” – https://www.britannica.com/science/reverse-transcriptase

Britannica: “Virus – size and shape” – https://www.britannica.com/science/virus/Malignant-transformation

PubMed: “Exposure to a 50 Hz electromagnetic field induces activation of the Epstein-Barr virus genome in latently infected human lymphoid cells.” – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9276003

Transcript of Dr. Klinghardt’s presentation July 2018 at Candida Summit: “EMF, 5G Cell Towers, Geoengineering and Retroviruses” – http://www.stopsmartmetersbc.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/EMF-5G-Cell-Towers-Geoengineering-and-Retroviruses-by-Dr.-Kilnghardt-Transcript-from-Presentation-at-Candida-Summit-Evan-Brand-July-2018.pdf

Microwave News: “NTP Cancer Results” – https://microwavenews.com/news-center/ntp-cancer-results

Microwave News: “NTP Peer Review Sees Tumor Risk” – https://microwavenews.com/news-center/ntp-peer-review-sees-tumor-risk

Children’s Health Defense: “Retroviruses: Poorly Understood Agents of Change” – https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/retroviruses-poorly-understood-agents-of-change/