This store requires javascript to be enabled for some features to work correctly.

Man holding a phone with 'EVO' branding outdoors
Person holding a black bag with a red portable in pocket, wearing blue overalls.
Pyramid-shaped device with gold top and black base on a wooden surface
EMF PROTECTION  - Photo of Phi Series Bundle Pack with one Phi 03, one Phi 02 Plugin, and one Phi 01 Portable

New to Blushield?

Start Here

Blushield EMF Protection Study Results

Featured Testimonials

Latest Articles

If Phones Are ‘Safe,’ Why Do They Tell You to Keep Your Distance?

If Phones Are ‘Safe,’ Why Do They Tell You to Keep Your Distance?

Phones are labeled “safe” largely because they meet regulatory limits based on outdated testing assumptions, yet manufacturers still advise keeping...

Active vs. Passive EMF Protection: Can a Non-Powered Device Truly Impact an Entire Room?

Active vs. Passive EMF Protection: Can a Non-Powered Device Truly Impact an Entire Room?

Passive EMF protection products without their own power cannot establish a dominant, coherent signal across a whole room because they...

Federal Health Agencies Revisit Cell Phone Radiation Risks After Years of Dismissal

Federal Health Agencies Revisit Cell Phone Radiation Risks After Years of Dismissal

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has initiated a renewed review of the potential health effects of cell...

If Phones Are ‘Safe,’ Why Do They Tell You to Keep Your Distance?

If Phones Are ‘Safe,’ Why Do They Tell You to Keep Your Distance?

Phones are labeled “safe” largely because they meet regulatory limits based on outdated testing assumptions, yet manufacturers still advise keeping distance because those tests don’t reflect real-life use, like carrying a phone in a pocket or against your skin. Since RF radiation drops off quickly with even small amounts of space, that distance matters more than most people realize. The guidance suggests an underlying contradiction: if direct contact truly posed no concern, there’d be no need for separation in the first place, especially given that phones emit radiation continuously, not just during active use.

Active vs. Passive EMF Protection: Can a Non-Powered Device Truly Impact an Entire Room?

Active vs. Passive EMF Protection: Can a Non-Powered Device Truly Impact an Entire Room?

Passive EMF protection products without their own power cannot establish a dominant, coherent signal across a whole room because they lack an internal power source, timing control, and the ability to maintain a structured reference signal independent of the constantly changing ambient electromagnetic environment; instead they only interact locally in the near field, whereas powered, dynamic signaling systems can emit a consistent reference that biology can respond to more reliably.

Federal Health Agencies Revisit Cell Phone Radiation Risks After Years of Dismissal

Federal Health Agencies Revisit Cell Phone Radiation Risks After Years of Dismissal

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has initiated a renewed review of the potential health effects of cell phone radiofrequency radiation after years during which government agencies publicly maintained that such exposure posed no known risks. Under the leadership of HHS and with longstanding FDA webpages asserting safety quietly taken down, this move aims to identify gaps in existing scientific knowledge and assess risks from modern wireless technologies, even as other federal agencies like the CDC and FCC still say there’s no clear evidence of harm. The shift follows earlier research suggesting links between radiation exposure and health issues, and reflects broader scientific debate over long-term effects as technology evolves.